Here's an article -- a real thinkeroo
by one Paul Waldman
at tompaine.com.
File it under
must and will weep
(salty tears of mirth division).
I'm not going to give it away -- but I will forearm you: it's nothing less than a general slogan for progress.

Comments (10)
I was thinking of writing a "Awww, C'mon, Donks! Let's Do It!" book myself, with liberally plagiarized guidance from the self-help industry and some junk sociology talking points. There's a real market for them.
Here are some donks stealing Colbert's satire in an effort to "take back the country". Note the discreet fund raising links splashed into the sidebar.
Posted by J. Alva Scruggs | May 4, 2006 6:04 PM
Posted on May 4, 2006 18:04
You know this is just a hackneyed rehashing of that whole "we need to frame the issues correctly" crap of...damn I forgot his name. He was all the fuss back during the 2004 primaries and afterwards. He wrote like two books on the subject? Help me out here. Anyone know who I am talking about?
Anyway, articles like these demonstrate the intellectual vacuouness of the modern liberal intelligentsia [sic]. As far as I can tell, these guys are actually concerned with change and progressive policy to some degree. They aren't DLC hacks or hired PR guns for hire (I don't think). Are they really that clueless that they can't see that the fundamental problem is the (intentional) lack of alternative policies/stances which renders the Democrats unelectable and unappealing? *sigh*
Posted by Tim D | May 4, 2006 11:01 PM
Posted on May 4, 2006 23:01
A telling bit of democrat snakeoil from the author:
"Unlike “the common good,” furthermore, the idea that we’re all in it together doesn’t necessarily imply personal sacrifice for others’ sake—that you have to give something up to benefit the common good."
Next our author will explain how to lose weight by eating cheesecake, increase the amount of energy in a closed system without adding anything, get your money for nothing and your chicks for free.
Posted by AlanSmithee | May 5, 2006 11:11 AM
Posted on May 5, 2006 11:11
George Lakoff, Tim.
Posted by J. Alva Scruggs | May 5, 2006 3:13 PM
Posted on May 5, 2006 15:13
I can't decide which cliche' I hate more, "Reframing" or "Circular Firing Squad." >:
The author tactfully avoids any mention of how his "common good" ideals fly directly in the face of the the neo-liberalism which has his party by the throat. Tact, after all, is what it's all about-- until it's time to thrash Nader again. :p
Speaking of crushed windpipes and dubious writings, my tome will be called "Triangulate Rhymes With Strangulate." I will remember you all fondly after I make my first million.
Posted by alsis39.9 | May 5, 2006 4:16 PM
Posted on May 5, 2006 16:16
I'd have to pick "Circular Firing Squad". It promises so much and delivers so little. . .
:'-(
Posted by J. Alva Scruggs | May 5, 2006 6:14 PM
Posted on May 5, 2006 18:14
Speaking of hoary DP loyalist cliches', another Pandagon love fest. Don't forget to check out Chris Clarke and R. Mildred, though. They're cool:
Please Hammer Don't Hurt 'Em
Note jedmunds' original link to this Aravosis guy, who essentially invokes the Vietnam Excuse: If we lose, it's because you meanies criticized us too much. Wahhhh !!
Seems appropriate, somehow.
Posted by alsis39.9 | May 6, 2006 9:58 AM
Posted on May 6, 2006 09:58
alsis
if that thread or whatever
it is
reflects typical
back and forth there
all the high kicks and lifted skirts
jeeeeez
i'm amazed at the energy
expenditure
to me a denizen of econ con blogs
its exhausting just to contemplate
shit
like
being in
a no exit last slug standing
wins a nose ring
can can competition
Posted by js paine | May 6, 2006 9:35 PM
Posted on May 6, 2006 21:35
Here's another groaner:
Which naturally led me to the speaker arrangements for those poor, cold liberals and this round up of lobbyists, many of whom appear to be Democrats nearly choking on the corporate largesse. Plenty of career there, if you can stomach the bootlicking.
Posted by J. Alva Scruggs | May 7, 2006 5:06 AM
Posted on May 7, 2006 05:06
to me a denizen of econ con blogs
its exhausting just to contemplate
Yeah, and I can't even work it into poetry, either. OTOH, consider the kind of East Coast liberal Jewish atheist secular humanist origins I've got. These arguments give me remarkable insight into the damned if you do/damned if you don't school of values that so plagues the citizens of more rigidly religious bacgrounds. Witness, for example, Kylroy complaining that the Greens are too obscure to merit more than occasional derision-- coupled with his/her disdain for Nader for using "top down" methods to introduce the Greens to millions of folks who would otherwise have never heard of them. Your party is evil because it's obscure. Or vice versa. But any attempt to lift the party from obscurity is merely a sign that... you're evil.
[Yawn.]
Now if everyone would please turn to page sixty-two in your hymnals for a song by Pearl Jam, or maybe Dan Bern. I forget.
Posted by alsis39.9 | May 8, 2006 12:26 PM
Posted on May 8, 2006 12:26