« Big Green: Lower your expectations | Main | Lieberman of the hour »

Battle of the -ons

By Michael J. Smith on Tuesday November 14 02:40 PM

So is it too crass and oversimplified to say that Murtha vs. Hoyer pits the Pentagon against Zion?

Since I personally have little use for either -on, I don't think I have a dog in this fight. Other thoughts, anyone?

Posted by Michael J. Smith on Tuesday November 14 02:40 PM |

Comments (4)

CK:

Well, the pentagon likes having our military but not necessarily using it.

Posted by CK | November 14, 2006 4:13 PM

Posted on November 14, 2006 16:13

Jonathan Lundell:

Let's not forget corrupti-on.

http://www.citizensforethics.org/press/newsrelease.php?view=178

Loyalty is the first virtue, I guess.

Posted by Jonathan Lundell | November 14, 2006 4:47 PM

Posted on November 14, 2006 16:47

js paine:

not my call ...
i see a pure inside the house tart fight here

but it makes me wonder...

it ain't straight up
rahm v murtha
brass hats against brass balls

i see hoyer limber as a mink
playing it as "honest broker "

all alas is irony

Posted by js paine | November 14, 2006 6:21 PM

Posted on November 14, 2006 18:21

Jonathan Lundell:

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001993.php has an unpretty account of the Abscam/Murtha backstory.

And Murtha says ethics and lobbying reform is "total crap (but it's good! if Nancy says so)": http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001995.php

Posted by Jonathan Lundell | November 15, 2006 3:58 PM

Posted on November 15, 2006 15:58

Post a comment

Search


About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 14, 2006 2:40 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Big Green: Lower your expectations.

The next post in this blog is Lieberman of the hour.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Subscribe to this blog's feed
[What is this?]
Creative Commons License

This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.31