By Owen Paine on Tuesday June 10, 2008 02:52 PM
Among Hillary's auxiliary troops might we number the Lesbian-American nation?
Yet who dares speak their name?
Not Mother Clinton, at least while in this final bruising stretch. If, say, this February last, St Hill was found to have once attended one of these folks' legendary Famous-Amos roasts -- I ask you, kind and gentle readers, would that not out-Jeremiah Jeremiah?
Comments (3)
to belabor the obvious
---in the valley of the shadow of PC
its well advised---
i'm but funnin'and ptretendin'
as lord dunkenfields might have said
a serious examination
of mother C's
lady auxilary
below leader level
prolly types out
more like....
straight as a draughtsman's edge
lower middle
economic range bitter losers
never chic feminists
nor diesel cocktailers
older middle to lower brow
utterly conventional to their
transitional era
very specific women of a disappearing type
all wearing pale scare able
un-glam-our -us faces
that often call their deeper anger
sadness
this rather generic mass market
brand of
identity politics
as irony would require
seems
to be massively
based
on a very mistaken identification
her ladies
are profoundly NOT
like HER
the real she creature
BDA hillary clinton
chroma keyed away
--a 70's technique ---
to play
their projected icon
Posted by op | June 11, 2008 10:40 AM
Posted on June 11, 2008 10:40
you've come a long way, baby,
to get where you've got to today!
you've got your own cigarette now, baby!
you've come a long, long way!
Sometimes, when I sing those words, it just makes me weep. They wrote music so much better back then.
Posted by Mike Flugennock | June 11, 2008 2:37 PM
Posted on June 11, 2008 14:37
These boots are made for walking, Flugennock.
Just remember that.
Posted by ms_xeno | June 11, 2008 9:16 PM
Posted on June 11, 2008 21:16