« My other man! | Main | Hillarycare, Part Deux »

Tweety birds

By Michael J. Smith on Thursday June 18, 2009 06:30 PM

Shown above, the seal of Israel's spy agency, Mossad, with its new, slightly less sinister motto (Proverbs 11:14, instead of 24:6 from the same book of cracker-barrel apophthegmata).

Needless to say, the Jerusalem spookery has been up to its elbows in the recent events in Iran.

We've all read about how those kewl up-to-date hip young people in Tehran are using Twitter to organize opposition to Ahmadinejad, right? Turns out there may be a bit more to the story:

Israeli Effort to Destabilize Iran Via Twitter #IranElection

Anyone using Twitter over the past few days knows that the topic of the Iranian election has been the most popular. Thousands of tweets and retweets alleging that the election was a fraud, calling for protests in Iran....

I became curious and decided to investigate the origins of the information. In doing so, I narrowed it down to a handful of people who have accounted for 30,000 Iran related tweets in the past few days. Each of them had some striking similarities -

  1. They each created their twitter accounts on Saturday June 13th.
  2. Each had extremely high number of Tweets since creating their profiles.
  3. “IranElection” was each of their most popular keyword
  4. With some very small exceptions, each were posting in ENGLISH.
  5. Half of them had the exact same profile photo
  6. Each had thousands of followers, with only a few friends. Most of their friends were EACH OTHER.
I narrowed the spammers down to three of the most persistent - @StopAhmadi @IranRiggedElect @Change_For_Iran

I decided to do a google search for 2 of the 3 - @StopAhmadi and @IranRiggedElect. The first page to come up was JPost (Jerusalem Post) which is a right wing newspaper pro-Israeli newspaper.

JPost actually ran a story about 3 people “who joined the social network mere hours ago have already amassed thousands of followers.” Why would a news organization post a story about 3 people who JUST JOINED TWITTER hours earlier? Is that newsworthy? JPost was the first (and only to my knowledge) major news source that mentioned these 3 spammers.

The whole thing is well worth reading; apparently the Jerusalem Post pulled the story our blogger mentions shortly after his post appeared.

That eloquent con artist Winston Churchill once observed (if memory serves) that truth is so valuable in wartime that it must be escorted with a bodyguard of lies. This may be a lemma of a more general law; another such lemma, I suspect, is that insight in times of crisis is always surrounded with a bodyguard of imbecilities, and the more important the crisis, the higher the ratio of imbecility to insight.

Here's a currently popular imbecility; this particular instance comes from one of my lefty mailing lists:

> Proof: Israeli Effort to Destabilize Iran Via Twitter #IranElection
> Monday, June 15, 2009 19:52
> Posted in category Politics
>
> iran1 Right-wing Israeli interests are engaged in an all out Twitter
> attack with hopes of delegitimizing the Iranian election and causing
> political instability within Iran.  
==============================================
These analyses in Ha'aretz suggest the major part of the Israeli right has 
exactly the opposite interest:

ANALYSIS / Ahmadinejad win actually preferable for Israel
By Amos Harel and Avi Issacharoff, Haaretz Correspondent
June 14 2009

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1092587.html

The narrow strategic thinking of pro-Ahmadinejad Israelis
By Aluf Benn
June 17 2009

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1093588.html
Pretty dumb, huh? Ahmadi is supposed to be preferred by the Israeli "right" (is there anything else in Israel but the "right" these days?) -- because he's easier to demonize. So it follows that if Israel were going to intervene in Iranian politics, it would be to keep Ahmadi in place. (This gambit has, of course, the convenient side-effect of further demonizing Ahmadi in the eyes of people who aren't Israel fans -- ah, there are wheels within wheels!)

Such sophomoric wiseacre-y overlooks a couple of important facts. One of these facts is that the Israel fan club's noise machine can demonize anybody it wants to, any time. It's what they do, and they've had a lot of practice and they've gotten really good at it.

More to the point, though, is that instability and turmoil in Iran -- with the possibility of regime collapse and serious social conflict -- is infinitely more valuable to Israel than any second-order propaganda advantage. The propaganda apparatus can be counted on to do its job effectively through thick and thin, but real upheaval in Iran is definitely thick, a consummation devoutly to be wished.

Seems like this ought to be elementary, but apparently it's not. I wonder why.

Well, no, actually, that's a lie. I think I know. The weenies who adopt the theory that Ahmadi is an invaluable propanda prize are assuming that the only people who matter in the world are people like themselves -- that is, sanctimonious moralizing liberals for whom a religious backwoods hick like Ahmadi is the Antichrist. Of course Israel must be deeply concerned all the time about what such good-hearted formerly Methodist Unitarians might be thinking.

After all, what else matters? Facts on the ground? Bah, that's vulgar materialism.

Comments (6)

op:

Zionic tweets
Shades of jericho's walls ?

Despite my dislike for excessive enthusiasm about the Ayatollah system, it seems pretty clear that, in the near term, this whole upheaval, whatever its good elements may be, is indeed going to give the US and Israel even freer hands.

hce:

I believe everything and nothing about Israel. Does Israel really want regime change in Iran? They might get a stooge of sorts into the presidency, but what about the Supreme One? Do they think they could convince 70 million Muslims to replace him? I dunno. Sounds a little hubristic to me, even for Israel.

It's entirely believable that Mossad was in there stirring things up, but Mossad is like the CIA, a rogue element, busy whether the heads of state know or approve or not.

This all reminds me of Georgia, two years ago. Certain things have to be said for public consumption, to keep our leaders from seeming impotent.

MJS:

Hubris is Israel's stock in trade. It's completely artificial, of course. Talk about a welfare queen: Israeli hubris is predicated on, and inconceivable without, Uncle's carte blanche.

Peter Ward:

Presumably, Nazi Germany was Hubristic by the same token--just because one's goal is unrealistic, viewed from a sober perspective, it does not follow that it will not be pursued...to the bitter end. Like a Shakespeare drama, where all the players end up dead.

MJS:

Yes. That's the interesting thing. There are roads you can take that don't allow you to go back. I think the Zionist road may be one of those. It leads to genocide or disaster or perhaps both, but once you've embarked upon it you have to follow it.

The original Zionists weren't all awful human beings, but nearly all their progeny now are -- and getting worse by the minute.

Can they repent and return? No. I don't think they can.

Uncle has the power to save the Zionists from themselves, but almost certainly won't exercise it -- at least, not under any circumstances that I can realistically imagine.

If Obama exercises that power, I will personally eat an Obama T-shirt.

Post a comment

Note also that comments with three or more links may be held for "moderation" -- a strange term to apply to the ghost in this blog's machine. Seems to be a hard-coded limitation of the blog software, unfortunately.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on Thursday June 18, 2009 06:30 PM.

The previous post in this blog was My other man!.

The next post in this blog is Hillarycare, Part Deux.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License

This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.31