The auld dominie: sinking fast

By Michael J. Smith on Thursday February 2, 2012 06:01 PM

So I was in the car again today and... you know what's coming: Yes, I was listening to my local NPR 'outlet', a term carefully chosen. Brian Lehrer, a longtime fixture on the local scene -- he even interviewed me once -- was talking to Jonathan Zimmerman, a professor at NYU -- aieee! -- about the Arizona law against school courses that encourage 'resentment'. The immediate occasion was the ban on a course which appears to have taught that the Mexican war was nakedly a war of conquest.

Zimmerman strangely seemed to believe that this was somehow a one-sided view of the matter, though it sounds to me like a thoroughly accurate characterization. Lehrer, to his credit, seemed a little dismayed to hear him talking this way -- he mentioned that Thoreau and the young Lincoln took the same view -- but like a good host, he let his guest blether on to the top of his bent.

(There doesn't seem to be a transcript up yet, but if you want to listen to the whole thing, be my guest. Warning: Zimmerman has a very annoying grating voice.)

At one point Lehrer asked Zimmerman -- quoting from memory here, so don't hold me to it: "Is teaching supposed to make patriots? Or just convey the facts? Is it to form skills?" -- and a number of other alternatives which I don't now remember, all equally unappetizing. And Zimmerman replied "It's to form good citizens."

Now apart from the fact that this program is hard to distinguish from Lehrer's first alternative, what struck me most, at first, was the breathtaking arrogance of it. The auld dominies have appointed themselves soul engineers.

Upon reflection, though, the conceit seemed less remarkable than the abjection -- strange to think, is it not, that the two can cohabit so intimately? All this study and thinking and dialectic, this painful mastery of dead languages and complicated mathematics, this sweaty fieldwork among the ants and the Hottentots -- it's all about delivering a high-quality feedstock of cives to the civitas?

Comments (9)

sk:

"What are our schools for if not for indoctrination against communism?"
- Richard Nixon in a speech before San Diego educators

Chomskyzinn:

I can't think of a nobler purpose of education than to stir --- and nurture and outright inflame ---resentment. If my child's education falls short in this vital pursuit, I plan to supplement it at home.

What was the occasion/topic of your Lehrer interview?

MJS:

Mine was just a modest neighborhood thing -- nothing of any consequence. Music, actually. Long story. The point, if any, is Lehrer's New Yorkishness and attentiveness -- when he's not distracted by the Big Topics -- to what's happening in his home town. He's a mixed picture, as who is not, but clearly institutional imperatives about even-handedness have made his show less interesting and more risible than it would have been -- I think -- if he had a free hand.

Boink:

pianophobia?

antonello:

Some random points:

Curious, these Arizona legislators appalled at the fostering of social resentment: they reek of such acidulous resentment themselves that it appears to be corroding their innards.

The Tempest as a catalyst to rancor? Do school boards see minority students as Calibans? Would the students themselves want to identify with a credulous half-man? As a pretext for ethnic studies, it seems as loftily contemptuous as Prospero.

How to "form good citizens" in our spiritless academies? O Frankensteinian task! How many cobbled and galvanized corpses, gathered up from battlefields, from prison graveyards, would be needed to make an exemplary citizen? And not just any citizen, but a modern-day American, the exception among exceptions. Dealers in fantasy though our leaders be, it would strain their resources to fashion this chimerical horde.

op:

good show
antonello

op:

chom

resentment can come thru the curiculur course and against it too

in fact i prefer the against mode

let the schools flail away at indoctrination
and
leave the counter thrusting up to
the "pupils"
their households
and their hood

Chomskyzinn:

Op: good point, and this also nurtures young 'uns in the habit of being against. And in learning where you find the truth and where you find the party line.

MJS: Brian has always struck me as a decent chap. I agree: you can feel his strain at balance, like when, in hostage-tape fashion, he feels compelled, as if by the threat of electrodes, to thank military callers for their service. But occasionally, the real Brian slips out. Not a Leninist or anything, but....

MJS:

I liked him in person. He's not a lefty by any means, but he has a good ear for bullshit.

Post a comment

Note also that comments with three or more links may be held for "moderation" -- a strange term to apply to the ghost in this blog's machine. Seems to be a hard-coded limitation of the blog software, unfortunately.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on Thursday February 2, 2012 06:01 PM.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License

This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.31