Pictured: Cold, hard bitches
She would no doubt embrace the comparison. Though Maggie would be the gold standard.
Completely unfair. Angela merely looks like her father, while Hillary has more of a “brutal contessa” about her. They might be an axis, but they’re not twins.
I will vote to join the Russian Federation before I vote for that disgusting hag Hillary Clinton. She makes Charles Manson look great.
Here’s her new video (please remember her “hubby” brought us NAFTA which destroyed the entire country):
Finally figured out what the Hillary logo reminds me of
Why can’t we have Cynthia McKinney?
Or at least Jesse Ventura?
With all due respect — People just flat-out refuse to think about the true nature of what passes for democracy. They keep supposing that we are just electing the wrong candidates. They say it over and over. So we will never ever get people like McKinney or Ventura. Why? Please let me restate the real problem:
Simple Score Voting — It’s Not “IRV” — And it eliminates 90% of the two-party spoiler effect trap!
It involves absolutely no fractions, division, multiplication, or other complications. Each voter can give from 1 to 10 votes to each of a certain number of candidates, up to say 20, since letting them give votes to 100 candidates would just take too long. They can’t give a zero (0) vote since then they could write in someone’s name and give zero votes, which is not nice. At the end of the day, all the votes are simply added up — that’s it. So you could, for example, give 10 votes to candidates you really want, and 9 votes to a “lesser evil”, but well financed, one. If the lesser evil one wins, you will only have sacrificed 10% of your voting power. It’s absolutely simple. This has been known at least since the time of French Revolution!
Also abolish machine vote collection and tallying. If it saves 10X of time and expenditure, it also makes it 10X easier to perpetrate systematic rigging. Which of these burdens can we truly afford to endure?
The entire answer really is just this simple!
Bayonet-rape aficionada versus glum Teutonic Eurocrat. Choose your poison. Hillary wins the award in the “whistle while you work” category. Milk sisters they may be from nursing on the same zio-tit, but Angie will never have Hillary’s unbridled sadistic gusto. Americans like their sociopaths with a bit of flair.
Comrades, if the 3 part series that Counterpunch has done on this monster is any indication, we might be saved by her own stupidity and ineptness in politicking. Her propensity for fucking up anything that she touches is astounding. If I was back in the country and lived in one of those toss up states, I would have certainly voted for a Repug to do all I could to stop this monster from further fucking up the world. Not that the Repugs are any better but with them in office, you can ALWAYS count on some nilly willy opposition from the Liberal fools, which although ineffective, it is amusing.
The worst part of this presidential campaign is having to watch my fellow middle-aged double Xers making a foul out of themselves in supporting this asshole because she’s a Wo-Man.
Apologies for horning in; I cannot resist:
Who’s the dude in the second one? (I love the Hills picture)
Thanks. I think. It’s former German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle. He & Kills shared the respective office at the time. If I remember correctly, I happened upon the photos in the news on the same day, and they were both actually wearing that color, as Guido was wont anyway, his party’s (Lib(ertarian)) being yellow, so I only had to saturate it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.