<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Stop Me Before I Vote Again</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1</id>
   <updated>2010-02-08T15:55:59Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.31</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Mind-forg&apos;d manacles?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/mindforgd_manacles.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2076</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-08T15:48:36Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-08T15:55:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary> I hate to report this, but the Father Scruffle Smiff &apos;just walk away hoss&apos; spiritual revival movement has not as yet really caught fire. Seems way too many folks are still not taking the rational option of strategic default.As...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Owen Paine</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="The mortgage trap" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[ 
<A HREF="http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs48/f/2009/178/e/0/ticky_tacky_by_catilakblues.jpg"><IMG SRC="http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs48/f/2009/178/e/0/ticky_tacky_by_catilakblues.jpg" width=480 height=360></A>
<P>

I hate to report this, but the Father Scruffle Smiff 'just walk away
hoss' spiritual revival movement has not as yet really caught fire.
Seems way too many folks are still not taking the rational option of
strategic default.<A HREF="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1494467" target="_blank">As an
inquiringly-minded NYT columnist notes</A>: 
<blockquote>
"Millions of American homeowners are “underwater,”... In Nevada,
nearly two-thirds of homeowners are in this category. Yet most of
them are dutifully continuing to pay their mortgages, despite
substantial financial incentives for walking away from them" </blockquote>

Don't ya just hate to read stuff like that? What in hell explains
this hypertrophied sucker play? I hope not some misplaced community
enforced morality... but i dunno. And guess what In states with
non-recourse mortgages, it's even worse, 'cause the rubes paid for a
walk-away option.  Again, the NYT: 

<blockquote>"In a report prepared for the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, Susan Woodward, an economist, estimated that home
buyers in such states paid an extra $800 in closing costs for each
$100,000 they borrowed. These fees are not made explicit to the
borrower, but if they were, more people might be willing to default,
figuring that they had paid for the right to do so." 
</blockquote>
That is, you have a blanket license at any time for any reason to
default on a non-recourse loan. You paid for that right up front.
"They" of course can shut off the damn credit spigot on ya for it...
but that only means something if the spigot's presently turned on
for you in the first place. 
<P>
Speaking of hidebound prig-sticker morality, here's my idea of a
real asswipe doing a no-harm no-foul flyby on this whole business.
It's from the industrious quill of none other then Mr Mark Thoma of
the Thomatic poisoning site '<a href=" http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2010/01/underwater-but-will-they-leave-the-pool.html" target="_blank">Econo Mist View</a>':  
<P>
<IMG SRC="http://www.facebook.com/profile/pic.php?oid=AAAAAQAQtZjcYvtyeG4GbuTl1VTNPAAAAAmvyfmcoeNipR84iIzXPKro&size=normal">
<P> 

 <blockquote>

"I think that people in non-recourse states understood the option a
bit differently... If medical costs wipe you out, if the demand for
the widgets you produce falls permanently causing you to lose your
job and also have trouble finding a new one, or if other things out
of your control cause you to be unable to pay your mortgage, then
you won't lose your car, furniture, heirlooms, etc. in a forced
liquidation to pay of as much as possible of the remaining balance
on the housing loan. Non-recourse protects you fro losing
everything. But a change in the price itself wasn't part of the
deal. You get to keep the upside, but have to eat the
downside-that's how it worked and you knew that going in. At least,
that's how I always understood the implicit deal (enforced in part
by a fear of losing access to credit in the future, social norms,
etc.).... Following this implicit rule lowers costs for everyone..." </blockquote>

What a goodie goodie dupe sap guff of a call that is. What a rubber
hammer of pettifogging conformity. Mr Thoma... may you live
forever... totally underwater.  
 ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Pwingnuts</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/pwingnuts.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2075</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-07T19:45:35Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-07T21:24:06Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Al Schumann writes: http://thepoorman.net/2010/02/04/obamas-death-squads-are-coming-for-you/ His schtick is comparing Obama&apos;s left-liberal critics to unhinged wingnuts. To pull that off, however poorly, he reaches for the wingnut guide to bad faith rhetoric and selects at random. I take a morbid interest...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Michael J. Smith</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="pwogwessives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[<IMG SRC="http://img.alibaba.com/photo/10287766/Die_cast_Zinc_Alloy_Wing_Nuts_Self_Lock.jpg">
<P>
Al Schumann writes: 

<blockquote>
<a href="http://thepoorman.net/2010/02/04/obamas-death-squads-are-coming-for-you/" target="_blank">
http://thepoorman.net/2010/02/04/obamas-death-squads-are-coming-for-you/</a>
<P>
His schtick is comparing Obama's left-liberal critics to unhinged
wingnuts. To pull that off, however poorly, he  reaches for the
wingnut guide to bad faith rhetoric and selects at random.
<P>
I take a morbid interest in the ways pwogs treat each other. What
differentiates them from paranoid, back-biting sectarians is an easy
accommodation with institutional authority. They take comfort in
revealed proprieties, provided there's broad institutional support and
enforcement, the same way religious authoritarians take comfort in the
revealed wisdom of theocrats. They're both dependent on the presence
of cops and pervasive systems of control. They can't generate an
individual conscience. They have no heuristics for determining right
and wrong outside the vulgar collectivist process. The lower
functioning ones, like The Poorman, are spitefully contemptuous of the
relatively enlightened high church proceduralism favored by their
grown up, successfully individuated brethren, e.g. Glenn Greenwald.
They fidget in rage and denounce them as no better than they ought to
be.
<P>
This accommodation makes it possible for them to function in
oligarchic systems. They'll always get smacked around by the wingnuts,
however, because they're "better" at accepting the revealed
legitimization they get from institutional authority. They can
grudgingly accept an electoral victory that elevates a Bush or a
Reagan. They'll behave themselves. The wingnuts of course immediately
start acting out when they feel a threat to their brand ascendancy.
<P>
It would be difficult to find people less suited to any form of
liberal democratic republicanism. Greenwald's careful skepticism and
painstaking explanation of due process enrages them.</blockquote>
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Piling on</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/piling_on.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2074</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-06T18:01:48Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-06T18:28:20Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Above is the man that out-Nixoned Nixon, Albert Shanker; and here is Shanker&apos;s latest avatar, Randi Weingarten: According to a union barking device from captive think tank EPI, she wants: &quot;contracts that include systems for fair and balanced evaluation...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Owen Paine</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="The credentialling sector" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[ 
<A HREF="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f9/Albert_Shanker_NYWTS.jpg"><IMG SRC="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f9/Albert_Shanker_NYWTS.jpg" width=480 height=718></A>
<P>
Above is the man that out-Nixoned Nixon, Albert Shanker; and here is Shanker's latest avatar, Randi Weingarten:  
<P>
<IMG SRC="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacherbeat/upload/2009/06/five_edweek_reporters_sat_down/Randi%20Weingarten.jpg"> 
<P>
<a href="http://www.epi.org/analysis_and_opinion/entry/unions_not_an_important_impediment_to_removing_ineffective_teachers/" target="_blank">According to a union barking device</a> from captive think tank EPI,  she wants: 

<blockquote>"contracts that include systems for fair and balanced evaluation of teacher performance (including, but not limited to measures of student achievement); and for the speedy removal of ineffective teachers, with simplified due process rules, when appropriate support fails to correct inadequacy." </blockquote>

Very un-Shanker-sounding, eh? Well, get a load of why: this could add 20% more teachers to any staff. Note the words "appropriate support": 

<blockquote>"Evaluation of teachers, including the mentoring of novices and of veterans in need of improvement, requires the employment of many additional supervisors of teachers. Call them master-or mentor-teachers... Schools today are under-administered. Frequently, one principal supervises as many as 30 teachers. No principal can evaluate and mentor this many... The reason we have such terrible "drive-by" teacher evaluation systems, with principals taking perfunctory peeks into classrooms, is that principals have no time (or training) to do it right. 
<P>
No other profession operates with such inadequate supervision. Can you imagine a nursing supervisor overseeing 30 nurses? A newspaper editor overseeing 30 reporters? A law firm partner overseeing 30 associates? Even an assembly line can't rely on only one foreman for 30 workers." 
</blockquote>
Prepare yourself: 
<blockquote>
"Management theorists recommend that no leader should have more than 5 direct-reports. The failure of public education to organize itself around this common-sense principle is the roadblock to fair and balanced evaluation. " 
<P>
"Blaming teacher unions for this failure is demagoguery...Administrations don't propose such systems mostly because they are very, very expensive." 
</blockquote>
Do we need another crankup in the teacher-to-victim ratio? A win for the union, yes. For the actual teachers, maybe not, and for the much abused pupils, almost certainly not. 
<P>
Personally, I'm all for it, up through grade 6 anyway. Lower school teachers are hot -- 
<P>
<IMG SRC="http://cdn.thefrisky.com/images/uploads/hot_teacher_c.jpg">
<P> 
... and I bet mentoring teachers are even hotter! 
<P>
<IMG SRC="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_MfG3SuuAhOQ/Sc0C9qjzY8I/AAAAAAAAA8k/pJQR7r2_Qlg/s400/dominatrix44.jpg">
<P>
  ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>My man!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/my_man_1.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2073</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-06T04:20:03Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-06T04:40:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Nothing very political about this post. I&apos;ve been reading up on John Milton lately, in aid of a literary project that may or may not bear any fruit. The guy has always been a hero of mine and with...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Michael J. Smith</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[<IMG SRC="http://library.thinkquest.org/06aug/01107/milton.gif"
<P>
Nothing very political about this post. 
<P>
I've been reading up on John Milton lately, in aid of a literary project that may or may not bear any fruit. The guy has always been a hero of mine and with every passing year I love him more. He too lived from dark days into hopeful days and back into dark ones, like my generation, but he never lost the faith.   
<P>
I took my old tired tattered copy of The Student's Milton off the self tonight to look something up. It's a book I bought forty years ago, and it's still in great shape. Appleton-Century put out a sturdy product in those days. The paper isn't brilliant white any more, but it's not all yellow and brittle, either, and the binding is still keeping the pages together. You open it up and it lies flat and nothing cracks. 
<P>
I opened it up about halfway through -- then the phone rang. I put the book down on the kitchen table. Went and answered the phone, and when I came back the book was lying open to the last chapter of Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce, not my favorite of Milton's prose works. But this was the first sentence my eyes lit upon. He's talking about Gratian, the canonist, "the Tubalcain of scholastic sophistry", and his brother-canonist Lombard, 

<blockquote>... whose overspreading barbarism hath not only infused their own bastardy upon the fruitfullest part of human learning, not only dissipated and dejected the clear light of nature in us, and of nations, but hath tainted the fountains of divine doctrine, and rendered the pure and solid law of God unbeneficial to us by their calamnious dunceries.
</blockquote>
I was having a good time until I got to "calamnious dunceries". At that point I started laughing so hard I was writhing in my chair and tears of mirth blurred my vision. Calamnious dunceries! Doesn't that describe nine-tenths -- or more -- of what we read and hear? 
<P>
Great man, that Johnnie Milton. 


]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>It&apos;s Bedlam out there</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/be_afraid_be_very_afraid.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2072</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-05T20:19:28Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-05T20:43:55Z</updated>
   
   <summary> One of luxury fringe effects of SMBIVA-ism... we can talk sensibly about the GOP. Enter the recent much footballed Kospoll on Repub mind sets -- here&apos;s the lede take of some fireworks peddler calling itself Sam Stein over at...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Owen Paine</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Be afraid" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.hss.state.ak.us/gcdse/history/Images/section%2003%20-%20renaissance/3h-BEDLAM~1.jpg"> <IMG SRC="http://www.hss.state.ak.us/gcdse/history/Images/section%2003%20-%20renaissance/3h-BEDLAM~1.jpg" width=480 height=825></a>
<P>
One of luxury fringe effects of SMBIVA-ism... we can talk sensibly about the GOP. Enter the recent <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2010/1/31/US/437" target="_blank">much footballed Kospoll</a> on Repub mind sets -- <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/02/large-portion-of-gop-thin_n_445951.html" target="_blank">here's the lede take</a> of some fireworks peddler calling itself Sam Stein over at Arianna's bath house:  

 
<blockquote>
A new poll of more than 2,000 self-identified Republican voters illustrates the incredible paranoia enveloping the party... The numbers speak for themselves -- a large portion of GOP voters think that President Obama is racist, socialist or a non-US citizen...  
 
<ul>
<li>39 percent of Republicans believe Obama should be impeached

<li>36 percent of Republicans believe Obama was not born in the United States 

<li>31 percent of Republicans believe Obama is a "Racist who hates White people" 

<li>63 percent of Republicans think Obama is a socialist

<li>24 percent of Republicans believe Obama wants "the terrorists to win" 

<li>21 percent of Republicans believe ACORN stole the 2008 election

<li>23 percent of Republicans believe that their state should secede from the United States 
</ul>
</blockquote>
It then quotes the fearless uberpimple of the kos-hive himself, summing it all up: 

<blockquote>"This is why it's becoming impossible for elected Republicans to work with Democrats to improve our country... 
<P>
They are a party beholden to conspiracy theorists... They think Obama is racist against white people and the second coming of Lenin. And if any of them stray and decide to do the right thing and try to work in a bipartisan fashion, they suffer primaries and attacks. Given what their base demands -- and this poll illustrates them perfectly -- it's no wonder the GOP is the party of no." </blockquote>

Would that the Dem pwog-base could be so chilling, eh? 
<P>
Okay, okay, don't task me with the Orthrian symbiotics of all this: the loons are on the march... we all must rally round the Magic Negro or we'll have Squadristi in the streets of our cities.  What outfit have you chosen?  
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Drop in the bucket</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/drop_in_the_bucket.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2071</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-05T17:57:47Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-05T19:39:22Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Ferdinand Trumka claims we need to generate 10 million jobs -- give or take one or two. If so, what in ballpark numbers oughta be the size of Stimpak II? I&apos;d say well in excess of 1.5 trillion dollars...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Owen Paine</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Toil and trouble" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[<IMG
SRC="http://www.labelsandgraphics.com/images/
Hard_Hat_Decal_American_Flag.jpg" width=480 height=360>
<P> 
 
<a href="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/01292010/watch2.html" target="_blank">
Ferdinand Trumka claims</a> we need to generate 10 million jobs -- give
or take one or two. If so, what in ballpark numbers oughta be the size of 
Stimpak II?  
<P>
I'd say well in excess of 1.5 trillion dollars over four quarters.
But citizens, be warned: though "Democrats from the president on
down say jobs are their No. 1 priority", <a href="http://appropriations.house.gov/pdf/2010_Jobs_For_Main_Street_Bill_Text.pdf" target="_blank">here's the House bill of December vintage</a>.  It's ten sizes too small, and that's before the
Senate gets a whack at it. 
<P>
Okay, so what's the size of the recent turbocharged Obama job
package? Does anyone know? Does anybody got a number or should I say
a grouping of numbers on this? Like a dollars-in package with a
spread and schedule set of numbers... plus a bit of multiplier
magic, as those numbers work their way through the markets and end
up producing a time-scheduled set of jobs-out numbers? 
<P>
I'm laying down a benchmark here: if after all is said and done the
input number is much more than 100-150 billion, I'll eat my big
toes.  
 <P>
<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/32291.html" target="_blank">I see this steady message</a> for at least the next year 
from the frontier of recovery: "The stag continues. All engines... half steam
ahead!" 
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Fish in a barrel</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/fish_in_a_barrel.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2070</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-04T19:43:45Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-04T19:47:25Z</updated>
   
   <summary> This, like most of my posts, prolly comes more from left field than left wing, left out than left bank... but here goes. I think the north hemisphere&apos;s greater left wastes too much energy pasting America&apos;s vicious clever spitefully...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Owen Paine</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="mini-me" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[ 
<IMG SRC="http://edmonton.canadaboom.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/mini_me.jpg">
<P> 
This, like most of my posts, prolly comes more from left field than left wing, left out than left bank... but here goes. 
<P>
I think the north hemisphere's greater left wastes too much energy pasting America's vicious clever spitefully greedy familiar, li'l Generalissimo Mini-Me Israel. The zionic rattlers are all long since so utterly exposed, what more might one say? The nasty little imp ain't gonna go away, no matter what we do. 
<P>
<IMG SRC="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41T01MTFB4L._SL500_.jpg">
<P>
Surely the whole business is like the perfect fast bag at the gym -- soft to the knuckles but durable and able to rattle around and back at you just as fast as you can punch it. Better even than a tar baby because one gets in as many hard licks as one wants. 
<P>
<IMG SRC="http://sporeflections.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/tarbaby1.jpg"> 
 ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>If they&apos;re so dumb -- why are they rich?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/if_theyre_so_dumb_why_are_they.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2069</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-04T03:30:20Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-04T03:42:45Z</updated>
   
   <summary> I give thanx for a link embedded in a generously brief post by my own personal rabbi of marx-sizzle-ism, the cranberry muffin king among list-masters, Lou Proyectile. &apos;Cause here is the ultimo locus-loco of the &quot;Uncle&apos;s Borg cubes sap...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Owen Paine</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Varia" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[ 
<IMG SRC="http://www.alexvisani.com/wallpaper/Uncle%20Sam%20wall1.jpg" width=480 height=360>
<P> 

I give thanx for <a href="http://www.chris-floyd.com/component/content/article/1-latest-news/1919-budgets-war-and-blind-ambition-the-limited-minds-of-the-american-elite.html" target="_blank">a link</a> embedded in a generously brief post by my own personal rabbi of marx-sizzle-ism, the cranberry muffin king among list-masters, Lou Proyectile. 'Cause here is the ultimo locus-loco of the "Uncle's Borg cubes sap our humanity" riff. Title: "The Limited Minds of the American Elite":  
<P>
1) Project and prospect: 

<blockquote>"We could easily dismantle the empire -- carefully, safely, with deliberation -- over the next ten years. It is a reasonable, moderate, serious option. It would not require violent revolution or vast social upheaval...Such an alternative is entirely achievable, by ordinary humans; it would require no divine miracles, no god-like heroes to bring it about." 
</blockquote>
Vision of the chance to make America anew: 

<blockquote>"Dismantling of America's global military empire -- and its global gulag -- would save trillions of dollars in the coming years. Not only from direct military spending, but also from the vastly reduced need for "Homeland security" funding in a world where the United States was no longer invading foreign lands, killing their people, supporting their tyrants -- and inciting revenge and resistance. 
<P>
This would release a flood of money for any number of "new domestic initiatives," while also giving scope for deep tax cuts across the board. Working people would thrive, the poor, the sick and the vulnerable would be bettered, businesses would grow, opportunity would expand, the care and education of our children would be greatly enhanced [but] those who have feasted so gluttonously for so long on blood money would not be quite as rich as they are now." </blockquote>

2) The jinxers: 

<blockquote>"Such a society is precisely what our elites cannot -- or, to be more accurate, will not -- imagine. Because, yes, it would "erode" their "influence" around the world to some extent. Although they would still be comfortable, coddled and privileged, they could no longer merge their individual psyches with the larger entity of a globe-spanning, death-dealing empire -- a connection which, although itself a projection of their own brains, gives them a forever-inflated sense of worth and importance... our elites.. can no longer fathom life without the exercise -- and worship -- of unrestricted power that empire entails. They will not accept -- or even contemplate -- any alternative to it." 
</blockquote>
3) The challenge: 
<blockquote>
"Empire -- the imposition of dominion by violence and threat of violence, and the financial and moral corruption this breeds, the malevolent example it sets at every level of society -- is the canker in the body politic. Until it is dealt with, there will be no healing, no hope, no change -- just more degradation and disaster all down the line." 
</blockquote>
No doubt it would be a great thing if Uncle took the Chalmers Johnson opt-out route. But there is no discussion of how the rest of the globe might reconfigure itself after Uncle walks away from his empire role -- apparently in ten annual steps. 
<P>
Say we accept this Gedanken Swedenizing of Norte America for a moment.  Uncle Sven's neat new inward-looking gig would not spell an end to global empiring, would it? 
Peripheral national liberators would still find their task unchanged -- they would in the end succeeed only by playing off the contradictions between the successor "great powers".  
<P>
Now to the pious reform of the metropole named America itself. Goo-goo strugglers, prepare yourself:  we can at best only impede the borg machines. We cannot choose to dismantle the borgs by means of majority rule. It's against the laws of Clio.  
<P>
If it looks to some of us hopeful sorts like it might happen anyway, bet on this: Clio will soon enough show us otherwise through her faithful agents, our guardian class. They are a global sort now, unlike their great- great- grandfathers. They are not narrow nationalists and the love of global "influence" -- let alone the joys of a psychic "merge" or "projection" -- has nothing fundemental to do with it.  
<P>
Their global perspective is an operational necessity; their corporate imperial state a global sine qua non. To them, the loss of the borgs would mean a loss of unimpeded corporate empire, a loss of freedom to span the globe in search of higher returns. 
<P> 
In the end, obviously, this means a loss of wealth,  and what's more, given their Faustian spirits, a loss of the potential for even greater wealth. They will see to it we don't vote this away, and if necessary, kill lots of us in the process. That is one civil war the bad guys would win under today's conditions.
<P>
The end of Uncle's primo earthwide status would directly and seriously dwarficate our the wealth prospects of our home-grown hegemons, our very own guardian class. One has only to look at Spain and Britain to see that.
<P>
Besides, the cost to us residents here, us weebles along for the imperial ride, is prolly minimal, looked at systemically after all the adjustments are taken into account.  The cost of maintaining the borg cubes is shared throughout the world market's interconnected parts of the globe. And these world markets were and are Uncle-rigged affairs from Day One, created modified and maintained to yield advantages that way way more than pay back Mr Hegemon for his blitz machines.  
<P>
Final big point: the domestic welfare of substantial hunks of the the primo nation's toiling oppressed and exploited masses can be lifted up, goo-goo style, as part of an opportunistic package deal, like the one struck in the early 50's between the soon to be moiged CIO and the corporate industrial sector; or in the 70's between law-abiding Southern black communities and new-South whitey.  
<P>
Where are we now in the reform/reaction cycle? The Reagan revival has lead by means oblique to its opposite, praise Clio. Now whether this means we're headed into maybe something big like a New Deal II, or just a very old oft-told and retold story called "muddling through"...
<P>
We'll just have to go out there into the thick of it,  and see what we can make of the opportunity -- eh, strugglebugs?  
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Bipartisan agreement on child abuse</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/bipartisan_agreement_on_child.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2068</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-02T19:09:19Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-02T19:45:38Z</updated>
   
   <summary> My rabbi Doug Henwood has a good memory. He writes: The difference between the parties http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/29/AR2010012903259.html Education Secretary Duncan calls Hurricane Katrina good for New Orleans schools Education Secretary Arne Duncan called Hurricane Katrina &quot;the best thing that happened...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Michael J. Smith</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="The credentialling sector" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[<IMG SRC="http://lancemannion.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/nickleby.jpg">
<P>
My rabbi Doug Henwood has a good memory. He writes: 

<blockquote><B>The difference between the parties</B>
 <P>
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/29/AR2010012903259.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/29/AR2010012903259.html</a>
<P>
<em>Education Secretary Duncan calls Hurricane Katrina good for New  
Orleans schools</em>
 <P>
Education Secretary Arne Duncan called Hurricane Katrina "the best  
thing that happened to the education system in New Orleans" because it  
forced the community to take steps to improve low-performing public  
schools, according to excerpts from a television interview made public  
Friday.
<P>
---
<P>
<em>Wall Street Journal - December 5, 2005
<P>
The Promise of Vouchers</em>
<BR>Milton Friedman
<P>
Most New Orleans schools are in ruins, as are the homes of the  
children who have attended them. The children are now scattered all  
over the country. This is a tragedy. It is also an opportunity to  
radically reform the educational system.
</blockquote>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Critical support</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/critical_support.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2067</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-02T15:45:36Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-04T02:06:16Z</updated>
   
   <summary> The criticism is negligible, but the support is critical....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Michael J. Smith</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="pwogwessives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[<IMG SRC="http://nickdownsouth.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/jockstrap.jpg">
<P>
The criticism is negligible, but the support is critical. ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Grading on the curve</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/grading_on_the_curve.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2066</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-01T16:51:42Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-01T18:31:12Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Land sakes! Mark Engler, the Doogie Howser of the pwog empire-watch crowd, gives the Obama admin a &quot;D&quot; -- yes, a &quot;D&quot; -- for its &quot;handling&quot; of the Honduran coup. A &quot;D&quot;! What the hell? They deserve a brass...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Owen Paine</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Our backyard" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[ 
<IMG
SRC="http://www.democracyuprising.com/images/MarkEngler-HiRes.jpg"
width=480 height=369>
<P>
Land sakes! Mark Engler, the Doogie Howser of the pwog empire-watch
crowd, <a href=" http://www.democracyuprising.com/articles/2009/report_card_honduras.php" target="_blank">gives the Obama admin </a>
a "D" -- yes, a "D" -- for its "handling" of the Honduran coup.  
 
<P>
A "D"! What the hell? They deserve a brass plaque somewhere
inconspicuous in the Captive Nations Hall Of Shame. Mark hizzseff
answers the uproar: 
<blockquote>
"Why not give Obama an “F”? Some progressives, disgusted by the
White House response, may be tempted to contend that it reflects a
Latin American foreign policy that is even worse than that of
President George W. Bush’s. 
<P>
This would be an error. The stances of
Bush appointees such as former Assistant Secretary of State for
Western Hemisphere Affairs Otto Reich -- who lauded the coup as a
necessary measure against the “expansion of Chavist
authoritarianism” -- shows that the position of the last
administration would likely have been far worse than that of the
present one. 
<P>
But the prospect that things could be even grimmer than
they are now does not mean that the White House deserves passing
marks for its efforts." 
</blockquote>
Amazing, eh? In Engler Academy,  Obamanauts only get an F if they do
worse than the Cheney gang. Who set those goal posts for ya, Mark?
The Council on Foreign Relations? The Central Intelligence Agency? 
<P>
Speaking of THE Company,  dearest Mark figures the Hondo topple
wasn't "a CIA black ops mission." I guess if it had been CIA,  it
woulda pulled a gentleman's "C".  
 ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Torches and pitchforks</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/torches_and_pitchforks.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2065</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-01T16:39:03Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-01T16:42:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Your louche commentator here can hardly claim to be a one-man weather station or fire warning system or for that matter even a trend spotter, but why oh why has more not been made of last week&apos;s Oregon tax...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Owen Paine</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Varia" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[<IMG
SRC="http://community.invisionpower.com/uploads/1247519429/
gallery_49404_3_93898.jpg">
<P>
Your louche commentator here can hardly claim to be a one-man
weather station or fire warning system or for that matter even a
trend spotter, but why oh why has more not been made of last week's
Oregon tax hike on the silk hat set? 
<P>
Those fearless tribunes and heroes of mine, the Nerf Stalinists, had
<a href=" http://www.peoplesworld.org/oregon-delivers-tax-the-rich-message/" target="_blank">this to say about it</a> a while back: 
 
<blockquote>
"Oregon voters delivered a "tax the rich" message yesterday, voting
to raise taxes on corporations and the wealthy to prevent cuts in
public education and other social services... The tax-the-rich
measures passed easily, with late returns showing a 54 percent to 46
percent ratio, The Oregonian reported. They drew strong support
throughout the state, including in areas considered more
conservative. Turnout was estimated at a substantial 60 percent. 
<P>
The vote is particularly significant because Oregon is known as an
anti-tax state. It has capped property taxes and voters have
rejected income tax increases twice in recent years, according to
The Oregonian. It is one of only five states without a sales tax." 
</blockquote>
Attention must be paid here, no? 
<P>
Now two types of state-level electoral events have cheered me in
recent memory: the hikes in the minimum wage in several states, and
now an actual real live class tax fight, won by the smurfery! 
<P>
PS to Oregon resident Madame Xeno: there is a space reserved for you
at the head of the comment table.  
 ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Our own Joe Sixpack speaks</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/02/our_own_joe_sixpack_speaks.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2064</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-01T16:17:26Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-01T16:23:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary> &quot;Be thankful for little things,&quot; my alcoholic purplish bubble of a neighbor likes to say as he passes me an unopened beer over the fence. I send this along in that same spirit. It&apos;s the estimable Henwood Doug, Father...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Owen Paine</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Varia" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[<IMG SRC="http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/usa/Images/real-joe-sixpack.JPG">
<P>
 "Be thankful for little things," my alcoholic purplish bubble of a
neighbor likes to say as he passes me an unopened beer over the
fence. I <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/frank01292010.html" target="_blank">send this along</a> in that same spirit. It's the estimable Henwood Doug, Father Smiff's idea of an economist. Doug is being interviewed
conspiratorially by Franz Frank, and as we zoom in, M. Poule is
clearing away some mental debris left by the fizzle of POTU Obama's
stimpak:  

<blockquote>"It's more about quality than quantity. On paper, the StimPak is
quite large. Of course, it'd be nice if it were larger, but as far
as these things go in our imaginatively parched times, the size
isn't bad. But a fundamental problem with it is that the Dems didn't
want it to be seen as some New Dealish government jobs program-they
bragged about how it was going to be about creating private sector
jobs, which are somehow "realer" than public sector ones. I guess
that means it's realer to be a food stylist than a teacher.... " 
</blockquote>
Later Franz asks him, approximately, "Why in God's name did those
White House numbskulls fire off this wet squib?" 
<P>
Doug: 

<blockquote>"Their own predilections, and the configurations of elite and
popular sentiment-though their predilections and elite sentiment
overlap considerably. The Obama people like The Market, and want to
nudge it into creating more private sector jobs. Elite opinion has
always hated public sector jobs... Anything that lessens the
disciplinary sting of unemployment, like WPA-style jobs, makes them
worry about the workers getting too confident and too demanding....
there's a bias among neoliberals, like Obama & Co., that sees public
sector jobs as phony and private sector jobs as real." 
</blockquote>
Yikes... they had to drag poor Doug out of his steam bath to give us
this Garfield the Cat act? Why any fee-simple green goo-goo with a
paper spike for a head could have... No, I can't bring myself to
mete out the rough and proper justice here. I'll just leave you with
my favorite line: 

<blockquote>"Cash for clunkers was a horrible waste of money. It was financed by
raiding funds originally intended for alternative energy research." 
</blockquote>
If this pearlike major brain can't see that his Park Slope take on
that majestic piece of corn-plaster showmanship is precisely why
"the configuration of popular sentiment" growls and bares its
canines whenever it can at passing by pwog ponderations like this...
well then... oh, why bother... one either gets it or... one just
plain don't. 
<P>
To cop an adios often favored by SMBIVA's own Madame Xeno, the
mordant dryad of Dry Gulch, Oregon: I need one those neighborly
beers myself right about now.  
 ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Twits</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/01/twits.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2063</id>
   
   <published>2010-01-31T19:00:48Z</published>
   <updated>2010-01-31T20:02:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Of course I&apos;m revealing my hopeless old-fartery here, but I don&apos;t get Twitter. The stuff is so ugly for one thing -- all those &apos;@&apos;s and &apos;#&apos;s; what&apos;s that about, anyway? And the abbreviations -- it&apos;s worse than IM....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Michael J. Smith</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="pwogwessives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[<IMG SRC="http://a3.twimg.com/profile_background_images/4224445/harrislacewellphoto.jpg">
<P>
Of course I'm revealing my hopeless old-fartery here, but I don't get Twitter. The stuff is so ugly for one thing -- all those '@'s and '#'s; what's that about, anyway? And the abbreviations -- it's worse than IM. 
<P>
Why follow anybody? 
<P>
Why let yourself be followed? 
<P>
I don't get it. 
<P>
One of my favorite Pwog buffoons, Melissa Harris-Lacewell, gets it, though. A soul-mate of mine -- that is to say, another dyspeptic old fart -- recently emailed me: 

<blockquote><a href="http://twitter.com/harrislacewell">http://twitter.com/harrislacewell</a>
<P>
That's Prof. Melissa
Harris-Nieman-Marcus-Bloomingdales-Bergdorf-Goodman-Lacewell.
<P>
My theory is that all trendy "social software" is designed for and
targeted at the most self-involved alpha consumers, with a view to
harvesting their bootlickers. Her presence on that site is all the
proof needed.</blockquote>

She has 10,000 "followers"! Why, for God's sake?  
<P>
<center>
*  *  *  *  *
<P>
</center>

<em>
<BR>When your vein of invention runs dry -- 
<BR>When your Muse says you need not apply -- 
<BR>When the Kosniks are dull,
<BR>Yielding nothing to cull -- 
<BR>Time to give Harris-Lacewell  a try. 
</em>
<P>
And she never disappoints. Here's her Twit "bio" -- where you've got to confine yourself to your bare-bones most-essential characteristics: 

<blockquote>Princeton Prof, MSNBC regular, contributor to The Nation. </blockquote>

Combing for a minute or two through the Twitcruft on her page did turn up<a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion/523870/the_obama_i_remember" target="_blank"> this gem</a>, sparkling in the riviere-des-diamants of gormless fatuity that is The Nation these days: 
 <blockquote>
Watching Barack Obama become President of the United States made me proud and hopeful, but I also found the experience somewhat amusing. I think many of us who were his Hyde Park neighbors and Illinois state senate constituents feel the same way. <P>
I don't know Barack Obama personally, but I had a kind of political intimacy with him during the years I lived in Chicago.
<P>
I distinctly remember the last time I had a personal interaction with him. We were both standing in line at the 55th Street Walgreens. He was wearing flip-flops, short basketball shorts, and an old t-shirt. He was buying ice for a family picnic. Hardly the icon of fashion cool he became within two years of that moment....
<P>
 These early encounters with Obama remind me that he is President not solely, or even primarily, because of innate gifts, but because he moves up a learning curve more swiftly and fully than anyone else in public life....
<P>
Today, as I watched President Obama interact with Republicans during the televised Q&A I saw another Obama that I remember: the law professor.
<P>
During the years that I was on faculty at the University of Chicago, my graduate students in political science often took courses with Professor Obama. They universally reported that he was a fair, but exceedingly tough practitioner of the Socratic method. He was willing to entertain any idea, question or observation, no matter how outrageous. But he always subjected the students to a series of logical interventions and arguments that often left students exhausted and sometimes a bit embarrassed. They quickly learned to challenge Professor Obama only if they had fully considered the implications of their arguments and prepared significant evidence in support of their case.
<P>
That Barack Obama showed up today. The President put on a clinic in public discourse, political argument, intellectual dexterity and moral courage. It was a reminder of what democracy could be if we engaged our opponents with substance, patience and civility rather than invectives, gamesmanship and boorishness. </blockquote>

"Political intimacy"! You wish, Melissa. Those short-shorts certainly stuck in your mind, didn't they? 
<P>
But of course what one loves best is that Obie's prime qualification for the presidency is that he's a) a good student and b) a tough teacher. 

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Please call if you cannot locate your icon</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2010/01/please_call_if_you_cannot_loca.html" />
   <id>tag:stopmebeforeivoteagain.org,2010://1.2062</id>
   
   <published>2010-01-31T03:42:51Z</published>
   <updated>2010-01-31T05:41:44Z</updated>
   
   <summary> A young friend of mine, now in her third year of high school, recently received the following letter from a functionary at her academic feedlot -- let&apos;s call it Creekvalley Prep. The letter is addressed to her and her...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Michael J. Smith</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="The credentialling sector" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/">
      <![CDATA[<IMG SRC="http://thehockeywriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Run-The-Gauntle-Wikimedia-Commons-243x300.jpg">
<P>
A young friend of mine, now in her third year of high school, recently received the following letter from a functionary at her academic feedlot -- let's call it Creekvalley Prep. The letter is addressed to her and her mom, and far too long to transcribe in full. I'll just give the best bits, with some tactful name-changing:

<blockquote>Dear Giudecca and Ms. Llewellyn: 
<P>
I am delighted to welcome you to the College Office. Although I have had the opportunity to see many of you... throughout the year, I now can turn my attention -- and the resources of the office -- to you as we enter the formal part of the college counseling process....
<P>
We will initiate the counseling process in an exploratory meeting with you and a counselor from our office. This meeting is important and parents should make every effort to attend.... Parents should get a copy of the student's schedule and <u>call Mrs Litotes in the College Office at XXX-XXXX to make an appointment that does not conflict with class obligations</u>. [<em>Underlining in original -- MJS</em>] To make the meeting most productive for all, students and parents are asked to complete the College Information Sheet and College Counseling Parent Questionnaire, both of which must be downloaded from the College Office Conference located on Giudecca's First Class desktop. Please call Mrs Litotes if you cannot locate your icon. Both documents must be returned to her in the College Office <u>three days before your meeting so they can be reviewed in advance</u>....
<P>
Each student brings a combination of many traits and talents, and a college environment should meet the full range of those needs....
<P>
In your work as a student, Giudecca, strive to develop the best possible academic profile. This record of achievement will be the "bedrock" of your college application. Commit to extracurricular activities that you find meaningful and fulfilling. What is important to you --along with your ability to reflect on that in an articulate way -- is what will make your application distinctive. 
<P>
Sincerely,  
<P>
<IMG SRC="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4001/4318104562_34628f9fec.jpg" width=250 height=82>
</blockquote>
That's the actual signature -- no shit -- which I felt free to reproduce, because nobody could ever get back to the actual person or school from this wildly overconfident, megalomaniac fuck-you scrawl. 
<P>
There are, it seems to me, several interesting things to note about the text: its semi-literacy, its vast length (the original is a closely-printed page and a half), and above all its minatory presumptuous tone. 
<P>
This encyclical emanates from a fairly prestigious New York private day day school. The author is some poor drudge in its placement office. She is addressing people who (except for the scholarship kids of course) make a lot more money than she does; many of them make more money in a week than she will make in her whole life. Others are household names, men and women of repute and renown. They're each paying (except for the scholarship families, again) as much as she gets paid every year to send their offspring to Creekvalley. And yet this schoolhouse appendage, this nematode, this remora, this liver fluke, feels entitled to address  her patrons and paymasters <em>de haut en bas</em>. 
<P>
Isn't it amazing how the colleges and their outriders -- like Miss Scribble above -- have gotten the injun sign on all of us? I don't suppose that any of the movers and shakers who received Scribble's dictatorial missive will resent it a bit. "Yes," they'll say, shaking their expensively-coiffed heads, "this is a serious business. Quite right, that Miss Scribble. Little Giudecca needs to buckle down!" 
<P>
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
