By Michael J. Smith on Friday March 3, 2006 09:48 PM
I know, I know, we're supposed to be abusing the Democrats here. But consider this image, from the New
York Times:
I've always said that the only good thing abut the Times is its photo editors, and this seems the definitive proof. Look at his eyes! There's some Procopian secret history here, or I'm a lizard.
Comments (5)
You remember her slip a few years ago? Referring to him as "my husband"? Adultery and grim liaisons are the rule in their social sphere.
I'm not sure I really want to know about them, but the salacious details of their romance would make a good farce.
Posted by J. Alva Scruggs | March 4, 2006 7:26 AM
Posted on March 4, 2006 07:26
What's the big deal? It's just a photo of Condi and her husband at some diplomatic function.
Posted by AlanSmithee | March 4, 2006 9:53 AM
Posted on March 4, 2006 09:53
Heh. Reminds me of the Boondocks story arc about Rice's secret marriage to Bush. Amongst other things, she slipped up on some pundit show and called him "my Schnoogumcakes."
Posted by alsis39.5 | March 4, 2006 10:40 AM
Posted on March 4, 2006 10:40
sorry keeeeds
I'm married to condi
and w has never poached not a once
Posted by jsp | March 4, 2006 3:33 PM
Posted on March 4, 2006 15:33
Not as far as you know, JSP. But she has a sly, crafty look. Hack into her e-mail, that's my advice.
Posted by MJS | March 4, 2006 8:54 PM
Posted on March 4, 2006 20:54