By Michael J. Smith on Tuesday November 14, 2006 02:40 PM
So is it too crass and oversimplified to say that Murtha vs. Hoyer pits the Pentagon
against Zion?
Since I personally have little use for either -on, I don't think I have a dog in this fight. Other thoughts, anyone?
Comments (4)
Well, the pentagon likes having our military but not necessarily using it.
Posted by CK | November 14, 2006 4:13 PM
Posted on November 14, 2006 16:13
Let's not forget corrupti-on.
http://www.citizensforethics.org/press/newsrelease.php?view=178
Loyalty is the first virtue, I guess.
Posted by Jonathan Lundell | November 14, 2006 4:47 PM
Posted on November 14, 2006 16:47
not my call ...
i see a pure inside the house tart fight here
but it makes me wonder...
it ain't straight up
rahm v murtha
brass hats against brass balls
i see hoyer limber as a mink
playing it as "honest broker "
all alas is irony
Posted by js paine | November 14, 2006 6:21 PM
Posted on November 14, 2006 18:21
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001993.php has an unpretty account of the Abscam/Murtha backstory.
And Murtha says ethics and lobbying reform is "total crap (but it's good! if Nancy says so)": http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001995.php
Posted by Jonathan Lundell | November 15, 2006 3:58 PM
Posted on November 15, 2006 15:58