« He's baaaack | Main | The ovary dialogues »

Shadow play

By Michael J. Smith on Saturday January 13, 2007 08:54 PM

Is there anybody in the world, outside of the hothouse world of congressional staffers, who understands what this battle of the frogs and mice is all about -- if anything? http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2007/01/13/house_defies_bush_oks_drug_plan/
House defies Bush, OK's drug plan

The US House of Representatives, in repudiation of President George W. Bush's Medicare prescription drug plan, yesterday passed a bill requiring the government to negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical companies.

....Several government officials.... said enabling Medicare -- through the secretary of health and human services -- to negotiate with drug companies would not drastically cut drug prices.

The bill "would have a negligible effect on federal spending because we anticipate that the secretary would be unable to negotiate prices across the broad range of covered Part D drugs that are more favorable than those obtained by the prescription drug plans," wrote the Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan research arm of Congress....

Senator Max Baucus , Democrat of Montana who helped negotiate the 2003 law, said he supports giving Medicare the ability to negotiate with drug makers.

Soon as the morning shades prevail, the Times takes up the wondrous tale:


Bush Threatens Veto of Medicare Drug Bill, but a Senator Is Seeking a Middle Ground

WASHINGTON, Jan. 11 — President Bush threatened on Thursday to veto legislation that would require the government to negotiate with pharmaceutical companies to obtain lower drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries.

But chances for passage of some version of the legislation increased when a pivotal figure, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said Congress should repeal a provision of the 2003 Medicare law that prohibits such negotiations. The chairman, Senator Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana, said he did not favor price controls, but did believe that Medicare should be able to negotiate prices in “discrete areas where seniors need our help the most.”

Here's the WaPo -- nothing like three-part counterpoint, so playable, so transparent:
Drug Bill Demonstrates Lobby's Pull
Democrats Feared Industry Would Stall Bigger Changes

Before taking control of the House last week, Democratic leaders briefly considered proposing a new government-run prescription drug program as a way to reduce seniors' drug costs, according to Democratic aides and lawmakers involved in the deliberations.

But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and her allies chose a far less ambitious plan -- to require the government to negotiate for lower Medicare drug prices.... They stepped back largely out of concern that the pharmaceutical industry would stall a complex change, denying them a quick victory on a top consumer-oriented priority....

To strengthen their position, drug firms and their trade groups have been transforming their Washington operations by hiring top Democratic lobbyists to gain access to new committee chairmen, bolstering Democratic political donations....

Even longtime industry nemeses like Rep. Fortney "Pete" Stark (D-Calif.), chairman of a House health panel, are impressed. "They're pretty potent," he said this week. "They're not bush-leaguers when it comes to spending money and lobbying."

Democrats... now that they have a chance to rewrite the law... are pressing for what party leaders concede is only a minor alteration. "This is a first step," said Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.

Well, after a little triangulation, maybe it's not so hard to understand after all.

Comments (3)

Chuck Rangel gave the game away in the last bit there. "First step" in donkey brayage translates roughly to "empty gesture meant to placate" in english. The DP takes so many "first steps" at shuch a fast pace that many observers are unaware that the fast steppers are marching in place.

js paine:

"DP takes so many "first steps" at such a fast pace that many observers are unaware that the fast steppers are marching in place"

smokin prose A.S.

js paine:

max bogus max bogus a name to conjure with these days
recall this quote posted here earlier apropos
the new wage min bill :

"Baucus ....is not entitled
to be chairman of the Senate Finance Committee,
which handles such key Democratic issues as health care, trade and tax policy.
That position ought to be reserved for a statesman with enough political confidence and backbone that he isn't constantly sacrificing the interests of his party and his country to the narrow interests of his subsidy-addicted constituents"

properly complete
the list of" narrow interests" hovering around up there
and such a "statesman"
-- ie one free of such parasites influences----
is not to be found anywhere

Post a comment

Note also that comments with three or more links may be held for "moderation" -- a strange term to apply to the ghost in this blog's machine. Seems to be a hard-coded limitation of the blog software, unfortunately.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on Saturday January 13, 2007 08:54 PM.

The previous post in this blog was He's baaaack.

The next post in this blog is The ovary dialogues.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License

This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.31