« Good dog | Main | Profiles in cowardice »

the politics of Reich and poor

By Owen Paine on Thursday September 20, 2007 10:21 AM

One of my heroes, Sir Bobby Reich -- the weeble-friendly K9 of the early Clinton years -- posted a nice one over at his blogsite:

http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2007/09/way-to-prevent-looming-recession.html

With the economy heading for recession... the question everyone is asking is how much [will] the Fed... cut short-term interest rates to stimulate the economy.... But a Fed rate cut won't stimulate the economy....[I]f a Fed rate cut can't prevent a recession, what can? Putting more money into Americans' pockets by cutting their taxes.... middle and lower-income Americans spend more when their taxes are cut... the biggest tax they face is the payroll tax.... the payroll tax needs to be cut ... exempt the first $15,000 of earnings from payroll taxes .... starting as soon as possible.
Perfect perfect perfect. Couldn't agree more, dear chap. Bobby even takes a vigorous swipe at the people's favorite love-the-little-guy party (the one with the long ears and the big corporate hospitality tent):
With a recession looming, Democrats need to stop being the party of Herbert Hoover economics.

Comments (4)

plato's cave:

I used to read The American Prospect when it first came out, and Reich was the inside-back-cover editorialist. He wrote many convincing pieces on programs and initiatives that were practical, simple and radical at once. He was the last time I believed that the Democrat party had a mind at all.

And he was a Democrat. I heard him speak during the 2004 Presidential primaries, and he was fully engaged in the futile exercise of predicting who was going to be the candidate.

He's kind of a mystery to me -- a thinking Democrat!

op:

i love the guy
and my wrathful Hand
is stayed
i smite not
the Dembot nation
with a final biblical smite
just cause
a few like bobby r
march still among em

Scruggs:

I too have a soft spot for the thoughtful Dems. They're liberal atavisms, albeit mostly along mythical lines of descent, and eccentricly appealing because of that. I can understand why they stick with people who mercilessly vampirize them -- the Kerrys, Clintons, et al. They hope for that golden moment when the support of their marginal constituency is so vital to the self-serving majority that they can wring a concession out of them. I think that's currently a seriously mistaken program, and actually harmful overall, as it keeps too many people diverted into being parasitized, but I don't think they're venal.

op:

scruggs
"
They hope for that golden moment when the support of their marginal constituency is so vital to the self-serving majority that they can wring a concession out of them. I think that's currently a seriously mistaken program, and actually harmful overall..."

i agree ten thousand percent
and if u suggest we bomb the donk tent
despite the harm's way status
of the munchkin reichwehr ...i can not say
it would be wrong
i just can't do it myself
till the munchkins come marching out
to the tune of

" the road to the next great reformation
will not be on the two party ballot "

Post a comment

Note also that comments with three or more links may be held for "moderation" -- a strange term to apply to the ghost in this blog's machine. Seems to be a hard-coded limitation of the blog software, unfortunately.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on Thursday September 20, 2007 10:21 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Good dog.

The next post in this blog is Profiles in cowardice.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License

This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.31