« Control freak | Main | Attackin' the Church »

Habt acht vor dem nächtlichen Heer!

By Michael J. Smith on Thursday March 13, 2008 07:01 PM

I was delighted by the site Owen recently sent us to:


... namely, Sara Robinson's ruminations on how pwoggies ought to emulate what she calls "conservatives":

... more and more of us are becoming aware of the ways that conservatives have quietly moved in to take over almost every public and private institution in America. From churches to university faculties to public broadcasting to the Boy Scouts, the vast network of institutions that once taught people how to live in a liberal democracy and reinforced those values across society has been shredded to the point where it no longer functions. In its place is a new network of institutions -- some of them operating within the co-opted shells of the old ones, others brand new -- that reinforce the conservative worldview at every turn.
What caught my eye about this was its wistful picture of benign "institutions" -- one imagines thick stone walls, heavy oaken gates, and of course sleepless high-minded liberal gatekeepers to tend them.

Within the walls is light and comfort. The peasants sing their simple lullabyes, enjoying the fruits of "liberal democracy" without ever having heard the phrase or knowing what it means, and certainly without acknowledging or understanding their debt to the gatekeepers.

But it's too good to last. Do the gatekeepers get tired? Or are they just too few, or their burden too great? By ones and twos, and then by scores and centuries, dark loathesome orc-like figures -- conservatives! -- creep in the shadows over the battlements and ultimately "take over" the institutions that Sara admires so much.

The core image here is one of dispossession. We pwoggies used to control the institutions, but then somehow those crafty conservatives stole a march on us, scaled the institutional wall, and "took over". How exactly did that happen? They must be fiendishly smart!

The element that's missing in this picture is what Anthony Trollope would have called the "Castle influence". Up there in the Castle, what is Lord Gormenghast doing? Does he play no role in this little drama?

Is it not possible that he wants the conservatives to take over? Perhaps... he has even paid them to scale the walls! Provided them with the ladders! And slipped the liberals a Mickey, on the crucial night, in the dark of the moon.

Forty years or so ago -- back in the reign of old Lord Gormenghast, who sleeps now in the halls of his fathers -- the peasants got a little restless. They stopped singing their lullabyes and went out into the streets and stopped traffic. Old Lord Gormenghast was alarmed. His counselors at the time, a crafty and subtle crew, spoke with one voice: "Summon the liberals! Let them devise... programs! Let them reform our institutions -- from churches to the Boy Scouts!"

It worked. It smelt like progress, and the peasants went back to their lullabyes. Then when the Castle decided the crisis had passed, and it was time to restore the status quo, the peasants looked at the liberals who were now managing the retrenchment -- and they blamed the liberals. And Lord Gormenghast, who never liked the liberals all that much anyway, was well pleased, and gave a well-received speech from the Castle battlements, admonishing the liberals for their failures.

I know, I know. Parables, when they go on too long, become tedious. So let's say it explicitly, if a little abstractly, and less picturesquely:

Sara's picture is one of institutions that are, you might say, ontologically prior to politics. The walls and gates have, as it were, existed from of old -- the work of Weland or nameless ettins from the dark backward and abysm of time. Somehow these perdurable "institutions" got "taken over" -- and so Sara's job is to take 'em back, naturally.

Sara has got it backwards. Politics are ontologically prior to institutions -- though Sara, with her liberal institution-worship, will almost certainly never be able to understand that fact, and indeed will resist the insight, I bet, to her dying day.

Sara's wistful hope is to do what the orcs did: scale the walls, slip over the battlements, re-take the "institutions". But she has, alas, forgotten about the Castle, or never understood it -- perhaps never wanted to understand it.

So when she gets at length to the top of her ladder, we can depend upon it that there will be an Orc to meet her, with an ax to chop off her aspiring head.

Not a minute too soon. I'm with the Orc on this one.

Comments (9)

Bat Delacourte:

It's clear the pwogs have mastered at least one wingnut skill for their vacuous irredentist crusade. They now have plenty of writers who are not at all shy about forcibly cretinizing their audiences.

Hey, Bat, you going to the "Take Back America" conference, which is a mere $395 for ALL the sessions AND the gala dinner?

Who wouldn't pay that sum just to hear the core political economist in this new insurgency -- Robert Kuttner! Swoon!!!!

Imagine the bold worker retraining ideas he's sure to unleash upon the world! Dare we dream of a return to the Clinton Age? I, for one, never permit my dreams to get that unrestrained.

Bat Delacourte:
Hey, Bat, you going to the "Take Back America" conference, which is a mere $395 for ALL the sessions AND the gala dinner?

Oh, the temptation! But I'm a rational economic actor, Michael, a self-maximizer through and through. I can achieve a better effect than the conference would give me for a bit less than $10 per session, if you know what I mean, and there's no hangover.

Are you saying there's a $10 substitute for Robert Kuttner? I need to know what that is! Do you realize that mortgage brokers could be retrained as bankruptcy counselors? That's not mere $10 insight, is it? And how would one find a fresher entertainer than the great Taker-Backer honoree Norman Lear? Did you realize some white people are racist, and that hilarious black folks could live in Manhattan high rises, even though they're really quite comically out of place there?

Bat Delacourte:

I don't want my genuine issue merit scholar decoder ring taken away, but I can safely say that entheogens are reasonably priced and, in any circumstances at all, make an excellent substitute for eating irredentist rubber chicken with Robert Kuttner.

I'd completely forgotten who Norman Lear was. I hope the honor bestowing Back-Takers don't do anything dreadful to him. Even television producers deserve better.

Isn't neoclassical economics a powerful entheogen? If I make spaghetti-ragu out of Paul Samuelson and a nice melange of Freidman/Hayek/Mises, won't I get an equally nice buzz? And shouldn't I sprinkle some Kuttner atop?

Help me, Bat!

Bat Delacourte:

Is Kuttner a neoclassical? I thought he was heterodoxological when it came to the faith; like Krugman, Stiglitz and Whatsisname. The axis of Miltie and Mises, on the other hand, are closed loop types, ever so slightly stark raving nuts. A few resounding axioms until they all of a sudden turn into bedbug scholars.

If you do partake, I recommend a Cipro chaser.


"Imagine the bold worker retraining ideas he's sure to unleash upon the world"

the creed of retraining
is like the romantic era
penal reform movement

redeem the criminal
but not thru punishing
and jailing him alone

but thru correction
by education and example
and productive activity
by socializing him
by by .....

its actually worse then
buying the job wacked soul off
its virtue
well it isn't cheaper
but it is more life sustaining ...
at least to the merits
watching from
the window
of that high pay prof-occ
--room of their own ---
they "earned "
by brains sweat and tears

Bat Delacourte:
but thru correction by education and example and productive activity by socializing him by by

By introducing him to the exclusive realm of Freedom, Equality, Property, and Bentham. Bentham! Bentham! Bentham! Aaaarrrgggh!

Post a comment

Note also that comments with three or more links may be held for "moderation" -- a strange term to apply to the ghost in this blog's machine. Seems to be a hard-coded limitation of the blog software, unfortunately.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on Thursday March 13, 2008 07:01 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Control freak.

The next post in this blog is Attackin' the Church.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License

This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.31