Public employees and their unions are often hated by poorly fact-oriented wage-class citizens, and today the reactionary cadre of the corporate class mischief movement are harvesting this misbegotten wrath.
Honorable if frustrating work this, battling the wave after wave of corporate-class lies about gubmint and its 'umble woikahs. And yet belief in the lies is running toward high tide these days, and why? Well yes, in part because the job class is predisposed to believe this stuff. But at least as important is the higher level of job insecurity in the private sector.
Obvious stuff, of course, but in the absence of a speedy and total recovery in both our job markets and our house lot markets, trying to get out the facts here about these toiling public servents to the nation's broad masses is nearly futile.
And by the way... as to the public sector unions: look, comrades, after clinging fiercely to the underbelly of the corporate-dominated Democratic party all these years, they have no one to blame but themselves if their corporate-groomed choice for prez has allowed a job class cratering, and subsequent protracted stagnation, of biblical proportions.
Comments (8)
Nice link, OP. I've only dealt with two public employee categories in my life -- the IRS and Post Office. Obviously neither were over-paid, and possibly, in the latter case, from the drained and despairing looks on their face, not paid at all.
However, out here in Calif we have a semi-public union of prison workers (Correctional Facility Supervisors, or something like that) and they are definitely over-paid and properly resented.
Posted by senecal | December 28, 2010 7:36 PM
Posted on December 28, 2010 19:36
"However, out here in Calif we have a semi-public union of prison workers (Correctional Facility Supervisors, or something like that) and they are definitely over-paid and properly resented"
Careful, Lil' Milty will come along and smack you for disrespecting the upstanding working class folks running those fine prisons there in Cali.
Posted by Drunk Pundit | December 28, 2010 11:00 PM
Posted on December 28, 2010 23:00
It makes me laugh remembering how I begged and pleaded with the overlords at my old public sector job for a semi-scheduled day off w/o pay every month or so. They looked at my like I was out of my mind. Now, of course, enforced unpaid furloughs are all the rage in the public sector. [shrug] I still think I was right to bolt five years ago when I did. Something about that culture just seems to make people squirrelly as hell in the end. Or else you end up on anti-depressant meds, like I did, trying to fight off the rodent-i-zation of your once-functioning soul.
Posted by ms_xeno | December 29, 2010 12:55 AM
Posted on December 29, 2010 00:55
Public sector used to be okay for the relative security and the benefits, but it's always been a crap shoot on working conditions. There's a touch of distilled corporate snake pit culture throughout. There are also wingnut patronage hounds who shouldn't be employed in any capacity, ever, anywhere, who slither their way into supervisory positions on the strength of their connections.
What amuses me no end are the "libertarian" career public sector employees. Tens of thousands of free-thinking rugged individualists, committed to small government, appalled by Waste, Fraud and AbuseĀ®, determined to uphold the principles of thrift and accountability... provided none of their cherished reforms take effect during their tenure.
That said, the collective punishment enthusiasts have a gift for taking dreariness and turning it into hell.
Posted by Al Schumann | December 29, 2010 6:52 AM
Posted on December 29, 2010 06:52
Okay, fish in a barrel, but as for the hacks being "properly resented," I assume that refers to the hoi polloi who want, who are trying, who endeavor to be better prison guards than the ones now performing that bitter job for the incarceral state.
The alternative to prison guard unions is to make them non-unionized? Prison guard unions, like the public sector "union" I belong to, are job protection rackets, with little to no regard for the poor whose misery they (we) profit from - but they must be so to protect their members from the misery that can be inflicted upon them from raging morons like Andrew Cuomo, academics full of fantasy reforms, and the libertarian dumbasses who blame the jobbing class for getting a job (Hey, Miltie!).
If "another world is possible," then there could be a public sector union full of compassionate, picketing and marching communitarian workplace dermokrats, but in the logic of the supersystem, there are only God Bless America management-friendly Andy Stern neurotics. The only effective militancy that I see, in any union, is when the prison guards decide upon their anti-management slowdowns - they make their points, they keep their jobs, at least so far - the Knights of Labor would be proud.
Posted by mjosefw | December 29, 2010 10:28 AM
Posted on December 29, 2010 10:28
"The alternative to prison guard unions is to make them non-unionized"
In so far as we must have prisons and prison guards (and I have this radical idea that perhaps we don't actually have to have them but discussion of that is beyond the scope of this little comment area) then its fine for them to be unionized.
But the real point is that the US has the most punitive legal system in the world and the prison system represents a gulag every bit as vast and dehumanizing as anything the soviets came up with despite the fact that we don't starve them or execute them without due process like the soviets did.
With a huge prison/industrial complex the prison guard unions have outsized influence compared to unions for other more mundane jobs.
Posted by Drunk Pundit | December 29, 2010 12:57 PM
Posted on December 29, 2010 12:57
stark fact
a third of pub sec workers
have a union job
one out of fourteen private sector workers
have a union job
this about reverses
the situation in the ike 50's
we have prolly 40-60 million
private sector
predominantly low skill
service/commercial jobs
that oughta be under a CBA (collective bargaining agreement )
its precisely these tens of millions
of unorganized
'McShitski-jobbled'
wagery souls
that would swing behind
their pub sec brothers and sisters
if they shared the advantages of a CBA
Posted by op | December 29, 2010 4:39 PM
Posted on December 29, 2010 16:39
'CBA' ?
..the facility had become a den of drugs
and crime with the co-operation of the guards,
who allowed inmates to control what transpired inside.'
the once upon a time people's republic of pavon -
prior to which only place i've seen a broomhandle mauser, carried by a
chilean prisoner
Posted by juan | January 5, 2011 9:18 AM
Posted on January 5, 2011 09:18