Behold the dueling Ivorian presidents!
It's a fine thing about providential outcomes, just when you 've made a giant shameless pinko Jimmy Swaggart of a ham out of yourself, as I did over the recent revoltin' developments in that battered Gallican stepchild of a country, Côte d'Ivoire. That hyped-up purple passion flourish no sooner having been typed and posted, don't a big fat fried egg get itself loosed toward my face? Facts on the ground conspired to frame me as a Chicken Little. Kool worldly sardonic me!
The evolving scene there, far from running blood like one of those Neapolitan saint's-day parades, has taken -- glory to Allah and the Fates -- a marvelously mock-epic turn. 'President yesterday' is holding out in his palace bunker, along with his wonderful French-despising wife vowing never to surrender thesupreme national office; while his rival "president tomorrow" is lying about in languid ineffectuality, holding moot court in an uptown western-built luxury hotel. All this even as the bulk of the residents of great city of Abinormal go without water or electricity or... civil governance!
Now we all know our cruise missile humanists care about every hair on every head on that darkest of dark corners of our planet -- so they must be relieved that the nonstop twopenny theatre of alternating slapstick and brutal cruelty down there has taken a turn toward the slapstick and away from the cruelty.
How do this pair of Dueling Presidents rate against the top performers from the continent? Not very high, I fear; not yet, at least. Why, Bokassa ate his rivals; Mobutu did every thing else but 'eat em, and by the freightcar load. Then there's the Tutsi business and the Congo and..yes of course there's the great paratrooping generalissimo Idi Anemin, one of Israel's many gifts to the world.
Only one such titan as he could possibly pass this way in my lifetime. But even that ultimo miles-gloriosus with his unreachable summits of deadly hilarity has rivals trying to best him, practically 24/7.
The collective project in post-colonial statecraft seems to be aimed at proving definitively that terror-state buffonery, African style, can beat anyplace else on earth. The continent's crimes against humanity are so richly textured with outlandishly bizzare crazy quiltings that the whole place seems to exist only to provoke us sivilized 'one world' folks into an apoplexy of the broadest possible whalebone-sized volleys of gasping horror, and fainting spells that would shake the resolve of W C Fields.
And talk about complex and contradictory -- often the very same players, even in the very same acts, can trick out the biggest guffaws imaginable from the Homer Simpsons and Don Cherrys of North America. I see them spewing back at the TV their last swallow of beer or munch of corn chips as one of these dreadnaughts is shown cavorting about like a circus elephant.
Now before you send the Red Guards over to hack me up, I'll ask this exculpatory rhetorical question:
Can any of this be real? I mean: can black Africa really be anything like this? Can't be, surely? Who the hell knows what really goes down there? The media confection must be the empire's... right? The most effective pro-imperial morality play we got.
Needless to say, in this day and age, if the top guys in Washington and Wall Street wanna get stuff across, I mean really across, they gotta go comic strip, whether it's to turn a sow's ear into a sunny day, or convert some ghastly charnel-house spree into playful tomfoolery.
"Africa", by the time we get it, is a TV show.
Readers, I pledge, starting today, I will refrain from any further outbursts of deep feeling and lacrymose agonizing about long-suffering Africa. I will never again break into a sanctimonious hollow threnody over the latest gargantuan gore-soaked pratfall or mind-rattling slaughterfest reported on from the cradle of humanity.
I leave that region entirely to -- who else -- the greatest spotlight-stealing Pecksniff of our time... Jeffrey Sachs.
Comments (12)
I take it you're including in the "Grand Game" the familiar villains -- diamond merchants, oil and mineral extractors, plantation owners, CIA abettors -- but consider them predictable and uninteresting. What you mean by "going cartoon."
Posted by senecal | April 13, 2011 12:31 PM
Posted on April 13, 2011 12:31
Very good. Meanwhile, this cries out for the SMBIVA touch:
“President Obama: If you cut Medicare and Medicaid benefits for me, my parents, my grandparents, or families like mine, don’t ask for a penny of my money or an hour of my time in 2012,” the petition’s pledge reads. “I’m going to focus on electing bold progressive candidates — not Democrats who help Republicans make harmful cuts.”
Posted by Michael Dawson | April 13, 2011 1:39 PM
Posted on April 13, 2011 13:39
How do this pair of Dueling Presidents rate against the top performers from the continent?
Yes, 'Big Man rule' seems to have fallen out of favor, what with the patrons (between 1:52 and 2:00 here) hiding behind fig leaves arranged by the Democracy Promotion priests, expertly assisted by ministers of Shock Therapy like the last man above.
Posted by sk | April 13, 2011 2:07 PM
Posted on April 13, 2011 14:07
Michael: Where did that come from? Whose petition?
Oh yes, it's SMBIVAn red meat, low-hanging fruit: choose your edible item.
Or a really fat pitch to hit, now that it's April.
Posted by chomskyzinn | April 13, 2011 2:09 PM
Posted on April 13, 2011 14:09
This particular African neo-colonial battlefield is, as always, more complicated than meets the eye. But of all people, James Imhofe, one of the dimmer bulbs in the Congress, seems to have figured out the role of French Imperialism in Ivory Coast. This article comes via Cynthia McKinney, watching from overseas:
http://www.voanews.com/english/news/africa/US-Senator-Obama-Administration-Wrong-on-Ivory-Coast--119369709.html
US Senator: Obama Administration 'Wrong' on Ivory Coast
Peter Clottey April 06, 2011
A U.S. senator says President Barak Obama’s administration “got it wrong” in its handling of the ongoing crisis in Ivory Coast following violent clashes between rival forces, which has left hundreds dead and tens of thousands fleeing the West African conflict.
In a VOA interview, Republican Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma says the Obama administration is backing the wrong side in the conflict and offered to provide evidence that it was mathematically impossible for Alassane Ouattara to win the disputed November presidential run-off vote over embattled President Laurent Gbagbo.
“I do know that the French have always had pretty much control of the government in the Ivory Coast and that’s just the way the French operate, until President Gbagbo got there and, of course, the French have been running against him ever since that time. And, the current opponent, Ouattara, is no exception; he is the chosen one by the French and, quite frankly, they rigged the election,” said Inhofe.
“I have shown on the Senate floor how they took the margin of victory that went to Ouattara… what precincts they stole that vote at and how they miscalculated it. How is it statistically possible for the primary election for Gbagbo to have received thousands and thousands of votes in that northern part of Cote d’Ivoire and then, in the run-off, he got zero? Statistically, that is impossible,” he added.
However, Inhofe acknowledges that his concerns about what he calls a “stolen election” have been overtaken by current events. Inhofe, who is also a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, says France is leading the charge to force Gbagbo to step down and cede power to Ouattara.
“The French have come in and I don’t know how many thousands of people they have killed because they won’t quantify it. They killed over a thousand in Deukoue, a town in the western part, and those were the people who are Gbagbo supporters. And they said that wasn’t us that killed the people, but it had to be because Gbagbo had no troops there. So it’s a reign of terror by Ouattara and it’s supported by the French... [I] am afraid I’m losing this one, but somebody has to tell the truth,” Inhofe said.
“Absolutely, they [Obama administration] had it wrong. They are wrong and I have sent letters to the secretary of state and to the administration giving them evidence of the election. It was totally ignored and so I criticized my own administration, as well as the French,” he added.
Inhofe also says the United Nations violated its charter by using military force against Gbagbo loyalists.
“They went in and immediately assumed that it was a legitimate election and, yet, we have all the evidence to the contrary. By the way, there are a lot of people in Africa who agree with me,” he said.
Meanwhile, Ouattara forces launched an assault on Gbagbo’s home Wednesday after he refused to admit electoral defeat and surrender. The forces met strong resistance from pro-Gbagbo troops, despite the fact that most solders from the regular army have laid down their arms.
Witnesses say they heard gunfire and explosions from the compound where Gbagbo, along with members of his family, is believed to be holed up. The fighting died down around midday Wednesday. Witnesses say the Ouattara forces retreated.
Aides to Ouattara say the fighters have been told to capture Gbagbo alive.
A Gbagbo spokesman said U.N. and French forces were involved in the assault, an allegation French officials have denied.
Posted by pjerome58 | April 13, 2011 2:44 PM
Posted on April 13, 2011 14:44
Michael Dawson:
"...the petition’s pledge reads. 'I’m going to focus on electing bold progressive candidates — not Democrats who help Republicans make harmful cuts.'”
So is this petition just a call for "More & Better Democrats/Recalls/Primaries" with a new coating of cheap gloss, or what?
Posted by ms_xeno | April 13, 2011 3:23 PM
Posted on April 13, 2011 15:23
pjerome58
if anything proves the point this does an okie gop senator comes off like he's on top of the real story
who knows outside a select inner
group of battling cabals
i will say
seems ole sarko has his bloody
finger prints everywhere these days
example here
french troops stormed the presidential palace
and took gbagbo's and his wonderful wife's "surrender "
and i like sk 's hesis
big man out color rev democracy in
it really is important
this sudden realization
multi party democracy is the better route for imperial penetration
big men have a certain leverage once firmly in the saddle no mattter who installed em
need to dialogue on this eh ????
Posted by op | April 13, 2011 4:11 PM
Posted on April 13, 2011 16:11
"... the U.S. government, the World Bank, political scientists, NGOs, think tanks, and various international organizations have appropriated the movement for democracy and human rights to export neoliberal policies throughout the world"
from sk's link
i'l not promote the author's book directly
this is a
commercial free
beggars' bowl only
operation the father runs here
see i told you stalin was right to put up an iron curtain
it get us reds 45 more years to prove
soviets plus gosplan even with a camp surrounding it
was still only zombeenomics
now we know for sure
we redheads had uhmmm...
an incomplete politico-economic model ...
soviets II plus gosplan II
is in its gestation period
even as we globally appear to retro gress
hell the globe IS safe for democracy
that is color democracy
trans nat inc can co exist
with universal pluralism
huxley over orwell
Posted by op | April 13, 2011 4:31 PM
Posted on April 13, 2011 16:31
Owen Paine sez on 04.13.11 @11:45:
...'President yesterday' is holding out in his palace bunker, along with his wonderful French-despising wife vowing never to surrender thesupreme national office; while his rival "president tomorrow" is lying about in languid ineffectuality, holding moot court in an uptown western-built luxury hotel. All this even as the bulk of the residents of great city of Abinormal go without water or electricity or... civil governance!
Wow... why does this somehow remind me of the last week of the Bush Regime; Gaza was being bombed to shit by the Israelis, while "President Tomorrow" sat on his ass in a cushy suite at the Hay-Adams, steadfastly remaining all quiet and dignified and serenely above it all, saying only something like "we only have one President at a time", or some lame shit as Gaza's being pummelled to death while President Tomorrow quietly awaits his coronation.
Oh, wait... was "President Tomorrow" not an analagous reference to Barack Obama? Oh, wow, sorry about that. That was really tasteless.
I guess that means I can skip what I was going to say about how these kind of situations in sub-Saharan African countries always seem like remakes of "Duck Soup".
Hail Fredonia!
Posted by Mike Flugennock | April 13, 2011 8:00 PM
Posted on April 13, 2011 20:00
Wonderful, OP! Which Huxley, by the way? But is there really a conflict there? Isn't Orwell about the domestic side, while Huxley is for foreign consumption?
Posted by senecal | April 13, 2011 8:07 PM
Posted on April 13, 2011 20:07
ms xeno sez on 04.13.11 @15:23:
So is this petition just a call for "More & Better Democrats/Recalls/Primaries" with a new coating of cheap gloss, or what?
Yeah, that's basically it, from the sound of it. It sounds really awesome and bad-assed the first time you read it, but each subsequent reading reveals more and more just how lame it is. It's all just about keeping 'em on the reservation.
I mean, Christ, man; they still think the current situation is going to be fixed with one more goddamned election.
(facepalm)
Posted by Mike Flugennock | April 13, 2011 9:39 PM
Posted on April 13, 2011 21:39
Well it's iron doors. So owen did close it.
Posted by Jerry Stillie | December 13, 2011 9:20 PM
Posted on December 13, 2011 21:20