« 58 Democrats vote against net neutrality | Main | Encouraging developments »

Time to exfiltrate

By Michael J. Smith on Sunday June 11, 2006 05:41 PM

You know you're in trouble when the high point of your day is Arianna Huffington.

I've spent the last three days in Las Vegas, lurking incognito at the Daily Kos convention. (Previous days here and here and here.)

Today was definitely the worst of the three, probably because the discourse was dominated by actual Democratic politicians -- officials, ex-officials, and candidates -- the sorry varmints that Kosniks so badly want to elect.

I. Lost Eden

Howard Dean may not be the very worst way to start your day, but anything worse would have to involve physical injury. His speech -- greeted with great enthusiasm, of course -- was interesting chiefly as a little tour through the alternative thought universe inhabited by liberal Democrats. Howard kept talking about "taking back" the country, "taking back" the party, "taking us back" to the high ideals -- of John F. Kennedy, forsooth. He must have used this phrase "take back" a hundred times. He even said the upheavals of the 1960s were an exercise in "taking back" America. He said we want open and honest government --or no, he said we want it "back."

Now this is very bizarre, when you think about it. When did "we" ever have the Democratic Party, or the country? When did they get taken away? By whom? How did that happen? Open and honest government -- when did we ever have that? Never, you say? Then how can we get it "back"? When did we live in this Eden that Howard wants to restore?

If God did not exist, Candide observes, man would have to invent him. This imaginary former state of grace is a necessary invention too. The Kosniks know that sometime in the last half-century, the Republicans acquired a decisive upper hand, and they know the country is going to hell in a handbasket. So far so good; but then they make a false step. They start with a conclusion -- restoring the Democrats to power would make things better -- and for there they reason backwards to the necessary premise, namely that we once enjoyed all these things they quite rightly want, and we lost them when the Republicans took over.

That's how it works for the audience, I think. But it doesn't seem likely that Howard Dean himself, or his colleagues in the Party apparatus, are subtle enough to have crafted such an appeal on the basis of their deep psychological insight. No, this "take back" mantra, for them, is simply a kind of Freudian slip. The takeback they have in mind is simply to take back a place at the trough for their office-seeking snouts. So the wish-fulfilment dream of the troops, and the unconscious self-revelation of the pols, dovetail in one of those beautiful, overdetermined conjunctures that nobody could ever have designed.

II. The microscopic eye

The Kosniks strenuously insist that they're worlds apart, ideologically, from the squalid Morlocks of the Fromsphere -- the "centrist" triangulators who inhabit organizations like the Democratic Leadership Council, the Public Policy Institute, Third Way and so on. But in the scant hour devoted this morning to a panel -- a poorly-attended panel -- on "War, foreign policy, and activism," I'll be damned if I could tell you how the views we were hearing -- with one conspicuous exception, to which we'll return -- differed in any way from the tough-but-smart competent-interventionist hokum you can find by the gigabyte on the From-pods' web sites.

The program promised us Ari Melber, Lakshmi Chaudhry, and Alex Rossmiller. Rossmiller is a scowling, short-haired former military-intelligence guy, Melber a scowling former Kerry apparatchik in a suit who writes the odd column for the New York Post and The Nation, and Chaudhry -- oh, everybody knows her.

Melber (shown left, in a photo lifted from what appears to be a dating site) objected to the "global war on terror" because he felt it wasn't sharply enough focused on "jihadism," and approvingly cited Dick Holbrooke -- Dick Holbrooke! -- to this effect. We should concentrate on our "top targets," Melber thought.

Rossmiller seconded the focus on "militant Islamists"; he compared the current conflict against this sinister force with earlier struggles against "fascism and communism." He sternly warned us against "reactionary isolationism," and assured us that the Democrats don't need a program or a plan -- all they need to do is point out that the Republicans have "screwed it up."

Chaudhry, like a doctor with a dire diagnosis, broke the really bad news: as far as Iraq is concerned, "abandonment is not an option."

I dunno, these "gate-crashers" sound a lot like the guys on the inside to me. Maybe there's some tiny but very important difference that's eluding my crude senses; but then, as the poet says,

Why hath not Man a microscopick Eye?
For this plain Reason: Man is not a Flye.

III. A loose cannon

The panel included another participant, not listed in the program, a slinky dame with an exotic accent. She got up and started talking and a wild surmise crept over me. "Who's this?" I asked a kind-looking neighbor. He stared at me as if I were Rip van Winkle, and sniffed, "Arianna Huffington!"

Say what you will about Arianna, you can't deny she's self-determined, and since I was starting to feel surrounded by nice, gentle Pod People, Arianna came as a breath of fresh air.

She started off by saying that the party should not endorse, nor Democrats vote for, any candidate who doesn't have a "clear and unequivocal" position on withdrawal of the troops. This may not sound like much, but in the context of Melber and Rossmiller it reeked of sansculotterie.

"Bloggers vill be courted!" she warned. "Perhaps ve should open a twenty-four hour hotline. Ven Hillary Clinton calls and asks you to run her online campaign, don't take ze offer!"

She had harsh words for the "smart guys in Washington" who are running the party. "Busby listened to the smart guys who said concentrate on corruption, don't talk about ze war, and she lost. And I don't vant to hear she lost by only five points -- she lost!"

Her best line: " 'Together ve can do better' -- zat is ze lamest slogan ever!"

She got some applause, but it was a little nervous.

IV. Give 'em hurl Harry

Why is Harry Reid so popular with the Kosniks? True, they loved that stunt he pulled back in November. You remember, he shut down the Senate with a procedural maeuver, in an attempt, so far unavailing as it turns out, to force an investigation into the administration's prewar manipulation of intelligence (a key part of the War Democrats' "We wuz fooled" defense). In a movement very short on victories, small satisfactions like this need to go a long way.

Or perhaps the Kosniks love Harry just because he was a little ahead of the curve, among electeds, in recognizing the usefulness of the Kosniks and their kin, and in stroking them with flattering attention.

Anyway, love him they do. You'd have thought he was Huey Long when he showed up last night. The Kosniks were clapping rhythmically, waving signs -- thoughtfully pre-positioned at each chair -- and chanting Har-ree! Har-ree! Har-ree! Every applause line got a standing, stormy ovation -- it was like a State of the Union address, or a Soviet central-committee meeting when the cult of personality was at its height. If you really feel the need to enthuse, it doesn't much matter, apparently, that what you're given to enthuse about is pretty thin gruel.

Har-ree began with a deft and highly professional stroking session, though he didn't have much to work on. "It was you, the bloggers, who stood against the Swift Boating of John Kerry, who defended Valerie Plame-- an American spy! -- who helped us defeat the insidious 'nuclear option.' " (This last phrase refers, of course, to the Senatorial Democrats' retention of a shrunken, desiccated vestige of the once-mighty filibuster, a "progressive" institution if ever there was one.)

"For the past six years, we've been on the wrong course," he said, which might raise, in some ill-disposed minds, the question of what Har-ree thought we were doing for the previous eight -- or thirty. But hey, nobody likes a Grinch.

Three dollar gasoline -- very bad. (Mr. Gore, would you care to comment on that?) The Iraq war must... "change." Shouts at this point of "Bring 'em home! We've got your back!" Har-ree didn't respond, though he must have felt greatly reassured that the Kosniks "have his back."

V. Milites gloriosi

The low point of the day, though, was the Fighting Dems. This is a theme -- meme? dream? scream? -- very close to the Kosnik heart: former military types running for office as Democrats. The idea is that they're vaccinated, as it were, against the security-wuss charge.

We heard from two of these macho dudes: one was a buffoon, and the other was Uriah Heep.

The buffoon was Eric Massa, running for Congress in New York's 29th district. (Shown at left, sharing what appears to be a prayerful moment with Wesley Clark.)

Massa had put together an entertaining but amateurish schtick involving a certain amount of mild profanity and bar-stool pugnacity -- various people were going to get their "asses kicked" if Massa goes to Washington. At one point he whipped off his jacket to don a Mark Warner T-shirt, an infelicitous move on his part, since he is a rather small and tubby man. It was hard not to like him, actually, but impossible to take him seriously.

The Uriah Heep was Joe Sestak, running for Congress in Pennsylvania, and truly one of the creepiest public presences I have ever seen. (Sestak is shown at left, while still an admiral, welcoming Congressman Mike McIntyre on a junket somewhere east of Suez. McIntyre is the blond, Sestak the brunette. The guy in the background is not there by choice.)

Sestak leaned very close to the mike and spoke in a low, whispery, husky voice. Listening to him, one felt trapped in an unsought and unwelcome intimacy, like a frottage victim on the subway.

Sestak is a retired admiral, and he treated us to a lot of purple rhetoric about the "eternal bond" of those who have worn the uniform. He dwelt at great and rather lascivious length on the blossoming youth of the aircraft-carrier sailors formerly under his command, and told a complicated and obscurely-relevant story about one of these Billy Budd types unhooking the catapult cable from a fighter jet.

Well, that would have been bad enough; I'd've taken a shower afterwards if I hadn't already checked out of my room. But then, as I sat in the corridor outside the meeting room, typing up this report on my trusty laptop, a young, earnest Kosnik came and settled himself nearby. He pulled out a cellphone, or a Blackberry or something, speed-dialed, and told the whole story all over again, almost word for word.

He had no more idea than I what the point of the tale was; his unseen interlocutor was clearly trying to figure it out too, judging by my Kosnik's response to unheard questions. But my Kosnik was deeply moved. Hey, it worked for him, and I guess that was the point.

VI. Dust from my sandals

The Kosniks, as I found when I first arrived, are not bad people. On the contrary, they are smart, engaging, well-meaning, and energetic, and a good many of 'em are, well, attractive. But after three days, I'd had enough of them, and then some. Couldn't wait to get to the airport -- and in this day and age, that says something.

The Kosniks are cultists, and there is, ultimately, nothing more tiresome. They've invested so much, emotionally, in the Democratic Party that it's made them rather shallow and monotonous. All their thinking, all their energy, is bent toward getting people like Massa and Sestak -- and ultimately, Warner or Hillary Clinton -- into office. As the song says:

One, two, three, what're we fighting for?
Don't ask me, I don't give a damn...
No doubt they all started with a vision, a generous, humane vision. But the instrument they chose to realize their vision has turned them into its instruments instead.

Good old C. Wright Mills said it all, half a century ago:

Crackpot realists are so rigidly focused on the next step that they become creatures of whatever the main drift -- the opportunist actions of innumerable men -- brings.

...In crackpot realism, a high-flying moral rhetoric is joined with an opportunist crawling among a great scatter of unfocused fears and demands. In fact, the main content of “politics” is now a struggle among men equally expert in practical next steps—which, in summary, make up the thrust toward war—and in great, round, hortatory principles.

... For they still believe that "winning" means something, although they never tell us what.

Comments (13)

I found your blog via the CounterPunch post. Yeah, mixed feelings about ykoss, I have been reading firedoglake today with the kind of pleasure you have when seeing people coming together and do something they believe in, but ultimately I just feel old and in the way. (I'm 48, but I was born that way.) Reading your thoughts really is a welcome counterpoint, I'm glad you went and appreciate your reports.

I also found your site thanks to CounterPunch and am glad I did. We plagiarized your masthead and put it at the top of OUR site (with prominent links to you) and hope that is okay?

A few of us here in Seattle are persona non grata around the liberal *movement* types for relentlessly decrying the stench of the Democratic party as our real problem right now. There is so little awareness it's frightening. Great to know we have close allies, politically and geographically.

Mike, at the MVP in Seattle

Majority Visibility Project

Massa & Sestak are two of KO$'s very favorite DCCC prowar sockpuppets. Massa in particular is constantly on AAR. They're both unopposed by local democrats in their heavily gerrymandered districts (NY29 & PA07 respectively) and both getting beaucoup denarii from Emperor Rahmses.

All in all this has been an excellent series on liberal Democratic blogs.

I started reading several of them back in late 2003 and I have to admit they were quite good for awhile.

But after the Dean campaign imploded, they lost a lot of their moorings, and they all gave way to a genuinely rigid loyalty to the democratic party, leftist bashing/red baiting, and the creepy militarism you so accurately point out.

The lack of support on any of the liberal democratic blogs for the September 24th anti-war protest was startling (quite a contrast to the way the Daily Kos covered the moblization for the anti-RNC protests so well).

I think "Atrios" jumped the shark for me after the failure of the Alito fillibuster and their commentators were angling for some way to blame Alito's confirmation on the Greens (and if you think I'm joking look through some of the threads just after Alito was confirmed).

They still have some value (when they attack the extreme right) but on the whole their weakness is tied to the weakness of the Democrats and the Democrats are going to take a lot of relatively decent people down with them.

I'm really happy I got a clue about the Democrats when I saw Kerry roll over and play dead in the face of the Swift Boat attacks, deny his own anti-war past, and let the "stab in the back" myth come back to horrifying life in 2004.

It's a huge part of the reason we're still in Iraq.

You're pretty funny and spot-on. I'm glad I found your blog.

Richard Perle was recently found in London opining his favorite dem candidate to be Joe Lieberman but failing that he would settle for Mark Warner.

Speaking of Huey Long, he had this joke. Congress is a restaurant with two sets of waiters, both sets serving the same meal prepared by Wall Street.

Huey Long is what we need now, or a revolution

Tim D:

Excellent reporting MJS. Your Kos-atopol Sketches seem to have attracted many new comrades. Perhaps this humble blog will finally start getting the attention it deserves...

By the way, according to the Guardian UK, Time.com has called Kos 'the left's own Kurt Cobain and Che Guevara rolled into one'.

Give me a @#$%& break...



Also chanced across this blog from Counterpunch. I'm glad I did; it gave me a few snide little laughs at the expense of all those ridiculous ex-crewcuts promising to "kick ass".

Clapping and cheering the likes of Wesley Clark isn't going to do anything. I suspect the Kos-heads know this, but are at a loss about what else to do. Sad, really.

Keep up the good work.

Checking back in... excellent 'ex-filtration' report... thanks.

[And a thanks to Alan SMithee for the BoH... ;)]

A long time poster at Kos, one who predates me [and I began posting there Nov 2002 after a longish lurk...]
anyway: the comparison was made to the CPUSA in the 50s. That half of what was at the meetings was FBI.

At least half of Kos is operatives of the DNC DLC NDN or the more rightie conservative Democrats, or operatives for Rahm, Schumer or Hillary.

FPers, and I am not alone in this observation, are operatives or beards to mask how operative laden the strange tent is...

I was banned NOT for outing anyone but asking if a very hyper nasty poster was an operative from the Schumer office.

That diced and sliced the tender skin of the boy-operatives.

It is above all else a very juvenile endeavor. And I think they know they come up short in the world of hard politics. LOL. Yes indeedy they do know that.

Basically, it is a low level rather messy extortion game.

Kos was promoting again his ''hundreds of thousands'' of readers while on MTP.

I suggest people look at the stats. Closely.

And pick a registration number of an active poster... then check the 10 registrations in either direction. Many "ghost" registrations.

The average "visit" is between 2 and 3 SECONDS.


Great analysis. When I saw the title of Messrs. Zuniga's and Armstrong's book, I found myself thinking that it was strictly a case of a bunch of young Sammy Glick types wanting to grab for themselves what others had, the only difference between them being the extra 15-20 years of age of those that already had. As someone who lives in a state where another Kos-approved Fighting Dem is running for the Senate (Virgnia and James Webb, respectively), I'm thoroughly sick of this meme, and am certain that if successful it will give us a senator who'll make everyone who currently supports Webb regret they ever had bad thoughts about Holy Joe Lieberman.

Thank you for that refreshing and honest report! Before even reading it, our members had been commenting on what a charade the KOS convention was. How you bill yourself as Progressive when you're sponsored by the NDN, an organization Lieberman founded as a DLC twin, is frankly beyond us.

Would you grant us permission to repost your article in full in our discussion forum? (http://www.progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php) We're a forum of serious Left-leaning voters who don't have time for any crap coming from either party. Proper links, credit etc would of course be included.

You rock!

Admin, Progressive Independent

(Reposting because the previous one was to the wrong story)


Good stuff -- as several others I found you via CounterPunch. I've been a long-time member of Kosland but got very disenchanted when the leaders disallowed discussion of and denied the Ohio election scandals. There's also a curious worship of the US military (based partly on Kos's background) and endless mourning of the US deaths in Iraq but not that much front-page coverage of e.g. Palestinian deaths. The newfound adulation of Gore -- who chose Joe Loserman for VP! -- marks another strange denial of history.

A great and funny post!

My take on the Kossacks...

Netroots: Snake oil, y’all?

Great insights and funny to boot!

I used to be a kossack, before the mass banning and all the stuff that went on... I left the site last year, after seeing what you saw at Yearly Kos. Not worth my time.

Thing is, what choice do we have but vote Dem ? Stop me before I vote again indeed!

I feel like singing like Tina Turner : "We don't need another Hero!". This waiting for a savior in a white horse mentality is keeping a lot of us on the left passive and inactive, like damsels waiting to be rescued while playing tea party with each other...

Post a comment

Note also that comments with three or more links may be held for "moderation" -- a strange term to apply to the ghost in this blog's machine. Seems to be a hard-coded limitation of the blog software, unfortunately.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on Sunday June 11, 2006 05:41 PM.

The previous post in this blog was 58 Democrats vote against net neutrality.

The next post in this blog is Encouraging developments.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License

This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.31