... better yet: Howard Zinn thinks Obie might be the new Lincoln:
Those of us on the Left who have criticized Obama, as I have, for his failure to take bold positions on the war and on the economy, must join the exultation of those Americans, black and white, who shouted and wept Tuesday night as they were informed that Barack Obama had won the presidential election. It is truly a historic moment, that a black man will lead our country. The enthusiasm of the young, black and white, the hopes of their elders, cannot simply be ignored."Must join"? "Cannot be ignored?" Oh Howard -- just watch me.
There was a similar moment a century and a half ago, in the year 1860, when Abraham Lincoln was elected president. Lincoln had been criticized harshly by the abolitionists, the anti-slavery movement, for his failure to take a clear, bold stand against slavery, for acting as a shrewd politician rather than a moral force. But when he was elected, the abolitionist leader Wendell Phillips, who had been an angry critic of Lincoln's cautiousness, recognized the possibility in his election....Presumably Obie "must" do all these things in the same sense that I "must" join in the euphoria over his election.What kind of change is needed? First, to announce the withdrawal of our troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, and to renounce the Bush doctrine of preventive war as well as the Carter doctrine of military action to control Mideast oil. He needs to radically change the direction of U.S. foreign policy, declare that the U.S. is a peace loving country which will not intervene militarily in other parts of the world, and start dismantling the military bases we have in over a hundred countries. Also he must begin meeting with Medvedev, the Russian leader, to reach agreement on the dismantling of the nuclear arsenals, in keeping with the Nuclear Anti-Proliferation Treaty.
Howard is a historian, a well-informed and well-read individual. What congeries of circumstances is going to force Obie to do all of Howard's 'musts'? Lincoln's hand was forced -- the slaveowners attacked Fort Sumter. To be sure, Lincoln rose to the occasion, most admirably (as did FDR, on a somewhat less world-historical scale). Obie, considered as an individual, is a pretty remarkable human specimen, and he might rise to an occasion too.
But somebody needs to give him one. A guy who's been tiptoeing through the tulips with Rahm Emmanuel and Dennis Ross, Larry Summers and Robert Rubin, is hardly likely to kick over the traces, sua sponte, and "withdraw... our troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, ... renounce the Bush doctrine of preventive war as well as the Carter doctrine of military action to control Mideast oil," and all that other good stuff on Howard's Christmas list.
Comments (9)
the what me worry potus???
tasks ahead call for a good emperor
not bush the next
the four score and ten mini me rat packers
are the wrong chorus
for the wrong horse opera
they too
shall be cast aside
---like so many desert falstaffs ---
as a chastened but unbowed
uncle hedge rises
to the tasks of global depression
like pantagruel in a three piece suit ....
Posted by op | November 8, 2008 7:06 AM
Posted on November 8, 2008 07:06
fuck abe
the man
abe the prez
conducted a slaughter
of our free white male based republic
but why ???
for the greater benefit of
the union
of industrial buzzards
free the africans
liberate em
all the better to steam roll
lady liberty herself
the chains are blown off yes
meanwhile
the exploiters of choice
take a green back bubble bath
abe was the first
gold leaf trim-ed
corporate potus
that war was hell on rails
iron rails son...
amputations by saw
for yeoman america
but hey
sure was great for big yankee bidnezz
Posted by op | November 8, 2008 8:18 AM
Posted on November 8, 2008 08:18
Perhaps the analogy isn't perfect, but will Obama become the American Gustav Stresemann?
Posted by dermokrat | November 8, 2008 12:43 PM
Posted on November 8, 2008 12:43
This is how Perry Anderson described the reaction of Eric Hobsbawm to New Labour tribulations in UK electoral politics of the past decade.
What makes it more interesting is Anderson's comment on '33 and Hobsbawm's personal history. Hobsbawm was a 15 year old Jewish schoolboy in Berlin when the Nazis came to power.
Posted by sk | November 8, 2008 12:45 PM
Posted on November 8, 2008 12:45
".. will Obama become the American Gustav Stresemann"
pure welsh-think
familiar faces in the clouds
Posted by op | November 9, 2008 8:58 AM
Posted on November 9, 2008 08:58
yeah, op? what makes you so sure? looks like things are going to get pretty ugly:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6e23cdc8-a517-11dd-b4f5-000077b07658.html
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_42b4104024799703.htm?campaign_id=rss_topStories
Posted by dermokrat | November 9, 2008 9:13 PM
Posted on November 9, 2008 21:13
wait, don't think i got that last link right:
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_42/b4104024799703.htm?campaign_id=rss_topStories
on top of that op, look at his economic dream team:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/07/useconomy-globalrecession
rubin, summers, volcker, printzker!?!
Posted by dermokrat | November 10, 2008 10:58 AM
Posted on November 10, 2008 10:58
Nonsense! Zinn's jumped on the banana boat headed for Loonystan. Obviously Obama is all set to be the next Edward Heath. Or possibly Charlemagne. I haven't decided which...
Posted by AlanSmithee | November 10, 2008 2:22 PM
Posted on November 10, 2008 14:22
It might be nice if our very own laurel-laden historian could get the name of perhaps the most pivotal document in the world correct...
These new creeps and fifth-columnists aren't planning an Iranian tea-party, Howie.
Posted by Michael Dawson | November 10, 2008 5:34 PM
Posted on November 10, 2008 17:34