« The low farce of mush mouth pwogs | Main | The Samson option »

Luke, I am your pappy

By Owen Paine on Monday March 31, 2008 08:16 PM

How many humans will he kill as president -- I mean -- how many more than either identity twin would?

Nice simple question for a pwog to conjure with -- given pwogs being basically the type that really get into weighing all folks equal and such. So really, I mean really, balance it up, gang. Bucket o' blood against bucket o' blood.

I can hear the heavy stertorous breathing already, as flight-deck Pappy morphs into Darth McCain. "People of earth! Your time is up!" -- then one big sea of floating human body parts sloshing about from ocean shore to ocean shore. Ahhh, the humanity, ahhh the mud the blood and the beer!

That is -- if he lives so long.

Comments (4)

tim d:

yeah...just like allan nairn said on DN!:

AMY GOODMAN: Are you saying that there’s no difference between [clinton, obama and edwards]?

ALLAN NAIRN: Well, fundamentally, there’s no difference on the basic principle of, are you against the killing of civilians and are you willing to enforce the murder laws. If we were willing to enforce the murder laws, the headquarters of each of these candidates could be raided, and various advisers and many candidates could be hauled away by the cops, because they have backed various actions that, under established principles like the Nuremberg Principles, like the principles set up in the Rwanda tribunals, the Bosnia tribunals, things that are unacceptable, like aggressive war, like the killing of civilians for political purposes. So, in a basic sense, there is no choice.

Al Schumann:

With McCain, we get Joe Lieberman as eminence grise.

Owen, I'm sure he'd live out the full length length of his term. They'd cyborg him, if necessary, just like they did to Cheney.



"let’s say, you have two candidates that are 99% the same—there’s only 1% difference between them—if you’re talking about decisions that affect a million lives—1% of a million is 10,000—that’s 10,000 lives. So, even though it’s a bitter choice, if you choose the one who is going to kill 10,000 fewer people, well, then you’ve saved 10,000 lives. We shouldn’t be limited to that choice. It’s unacceptable. And Americans should start to realize that it’s unacceptable. "

boil it down to the net diff

save ten thousand living human souls

stop mcpappy

this rude
short haul calculus
is it complete enough for ya ???

if we are to even vote
let alone "work for it "
ought we not
an anti empire candidate

btw is ralph anti empire
is his " curb the corps now "
anti empire
or just empire xxx-lite

Tim D:

OP - not you're right, Nairn seems to imply in that interview that even nader is soft on murder, if not an outright collaborator for endorsing Edwards...

Post a comment

Note also that comments with three or more links may be held for "moderation" -- a strange term to apply to the ghost in this blog's machine. Seems to be a hard-coded limitation of the blog software, unfortunately.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on Monday March 31, 2008 08:16 PM.

The previous post in this blog was The low farce of mush mouth pwogs.

The next post in this blog is The Samson option.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License

This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.31